Article
Original Article

Dinesh Babu a, Balashanmugam Baskaranarayananb , Karunanidhi c, Manonmani Arumugamd

a Assistant Professor, ICH&HC,Chennai, bProfessor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Tamilnadu Government Dental College  and Hospital, Chennai, India, cDean, Madha Dental College and Hospital, Kundrathur, Chennai, d Private Practitioner, Bengaluru 

Corresponding author

Dr. Balashanmugam Baskaranarayanan 8-B, Crescent Road, Shenoynagar Chennai- 600 030, Tamilnadu, India. E-Mail: balasorthodontics@gmail.com

Year: 2015, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Page no. 55-61,
Views: 654, Downloads: 3
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

This was a study conducted in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics at Government Dental College & Hospital. The study was designed to determine the correlation between chronological age, cervical vertebrae maturation and Hand - Wrist maturation stages in Chennai population. The study included a total of 500 patients (250 males and 250 females) belonging to age group of 9 to 16 years.

The results indicated that there was a high correlation between chronological age and stage V in Hand –Wrist; and maturation stage in Cervical Vertebrae (p=0.0 18) ,whereas low correlation was seen between chronological age and other stages in both Hand-Wrist and cervical vertebrae stages. This lead to the conclusion that chronological age, taken alone is a poor indicator of skeletal maturity, and should be supplemented with the analysis of hand wrist and cervical vertebral maturation.

<p>This was a study conducted in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics at Government Dental College &amp; Hospital. The study was designed to determine the correlation between chronological age, cervical vertebrae maturation and Hand - Wrist maturation stages in Chennai population. The study included a total of 500 patients (250 males and 250 females) belonging to age group of 9 to 16 years.</p> <p>The results indicated that there was a high correlation between chronological age and stage V in Hand &ndash;Wrist; and maturation stage in Cervical Vertebrae (p=0.0 18) ,whereas low correlation was seen between chronological age and other stages in both Hand-Wrist and cervical vertebrae stages. This lead to the conclusion that chronological age, taken alone is a poor indicator of skeletal maturity, and should be supplemented with the analysis of hand wrist and cervical vertebral maturation.</p>
Keywords
Hand-wrist radiograph, cervical vertebrae maturation, chronological age, circumpubertal period
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

None

Supporting File
No Pictures
References

None

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.