Article
Original Article

Murthy Kumar V

Address for correspondence:

Dr Murthy Kumar V #525, Tank Road Doddballapur 561 203 Bangalore Rural District, murthy_dbp@yahoo.com

Associate Professor. Department of Surgery, Akash Institute of Medical Science, Devanahalli.

 

Year: 2014, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Page no. 22-25,
Views: 510, Downloads: 0
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Context: One of the commonly performed surgeries for inguinal hernias is tension free mesh repair (Lichtenstein Mesh Repair). Recurrence after lichtenstein repair varies between 0-12%, with a mean of 3-4%. The common sites of recurrences include area just above and lateral to pubic tubercle, area lateral to internal ring. The following study is conducted with the intension of evaluating the efficacy of the newer method of mesh fixation

Aim: To study the factors of postoperative pain, morbidity and recurrence following partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia and comparing the same with Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia

Methods and Material: Patients were divided into group A and group B who underwent Lichrenstein and partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair respectively. Postoperatively patients were followed up up to 1 year and various factors such as pain, loss of sensation and recurrence were evaluated.

Results: During 8 day follow-up, patients who underwent partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair complained less pain compared to other group. But they had higher chance of loss of sensation. During later follow-ups no significant difference was noted. No recurrence was noted in our study.

Conclusion: Partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair can be used as an effective alternative to Lichtenstein mesh repair with the advantage of covering the potential weak point of medial and lateral ends inguinal canal more widely.

 

<p><strong>Context: </strong>One of the commonly performed surgeries for inguinal hernias is tension free mesh repair (Lichtenstein Mesh Repair). Recurrence after lichtenstein repair varies between 0-12%, with a mean of 3-4%. The common sites of recurrences include area just above and lateral to pubic tubercle, area lateral to internal ring. The following study is conducted with the intension of evaluating the efficacy of the newer method of mesh fixation</p> <p><strong>Aim:</strong> To study the factors of postoperative pain, morbidity and recurrence following partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia and comparing the same with Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia</p> <p><strong>Methods and Material:</strong> Patients were divided into group A and group B who underwent Lichrenstein and partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair respectively. Postoperatively patients were followed up up to 1 year and various factors such as pain, loss of sensation and recurrence were evaluated.</p> <p>Results: During 8 day follow-up, patients who underwent partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair complained less pain compared to other group. But they had higher chance of loss of sensation. During later follow-ups no significant difference was noted. No recurrence was noted in our study.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair can be used as an effective alternative to Lichtenstein mesh repair with the advantage of covering the potential weak point of medial and lateral ends inguinal canal more widely.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>
Keywords
inguinal hernia, Lichtenstein repair, partial pre-peritoneal mesh repair
Downloads
    No Downloads
Article

none

Supporting File
No Pictures
References

none

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.