Article
Original Article

 R.Vinay Kumar1 , N.R Ramesh Masthi2

1  Department of T.B & Chest Diseases ,2Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical   Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 

Year: 2013, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Page no. 78-84,
Views: 612, Downloads: 3
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the knowledge about universal and isolation precautions (UIP) in the undergraduate medical students (UMS) before and after educational intervention .Design: Semi-structured, self-designed, tested questionnaire before and after educational intervention were filled-up by the students. Data was entered and analyzed using the EpiInfo-version 6 statistical package and Chi-square test respectively. Setting:Medical college situated in Bangalore. Participants: 260 undergraduate para-clinical & clinical medical students. Outcome Measure: Assessing i) having heard the UIP related phrases ii) knowledge of infection transmission in hospital setting iii) UIPrelated practice iv) Aptitude test to recall barrier methods/objects of UIP.

Results: 167 (64.23%) students had heard of universal precautions and 133(51.15%) responded had knowledge about Universal Precautions. 102 (39.2%) and 111 (42.7%) knew of correct hand washing procedure with respect to examining the patient and using the gloves respectively. 240 (77.8%) students said they would do recapping or manipulating used needles and 89 (58.9%) responded about disposing needle in manner that could cause needle stick injury to other health-care workers.221 (85%) students just knew less than three barrier objects of UIP' practice and most commonly known object was glove.

Conclusion; Under graduate medical student's (UMS) knowledge on UIP is less than satisfactory. Third term students lagged behind the rest of UMS [p< 0.01] and so were refresher' batches as compared with the corresponding main batches in all questions relating to UIP, in both pretest and post-test [p < 0.05].There is increased awareness of UIP as student goes to higher terms and with educational interventions [p < 0.01]. Further large scale study on national basis has to be undertaken to assess the magnitude of ignorance and to plan awareness programme.

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To assess the knowledge about universal and isolation precautions (UIP) in the undergraduate medical students (UMS) before and after educational intervention .<strong>Design: </strong>Semi-structured, self-designed, tested questionnaire before and after educational intervention were filled-up by the students. Data was entered and analyzed using the EpiInfo-version 6 statistical package and Chi-square test respectively. <strong>Setting:</strong>Medical college situated in Bangalore. <strong>Participants:</strong> 260 undergraduate para-clinical &amp; clinical medical students. <strong>Outcome Measure:</strong> Assessing i) having heard the UIP related phrases ii) knowledge of infection transmission in hospital setting iii) UIPrelated practice iv) Aptitude test to recall barrier methods/objects of UIP.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> 167 (64.23%) students had heard of universal precautions and 133(51.15%) responded had knowledge about Universal Precautions. 102 (39.2%) and 111 (42.7%) knew of correct hand washing procedure with respect to examining the patient and using the gloves respectively. 240 (77.8%) students said they would do recapping or manipulating used needles and 89 (58.9%) responded about disposing needle in manner that could cause needle stick injury to other health-care workers.221 (85%) students just knew less than three barrier objects of UIP' practice and most commonly known object was glove.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion; </strong>Under graduate medical student's (UMS) knowledge on UIP is less than satisfactory. Third term students lagged behind the rest of UMS [p&lt; 0.01] and so were refresher' batches as compared with the corresponding main batches in all questions relating to UIP, in both pretest and post-test [p &lt; 0.05].There is increased awareness of UIP as student goes to higher terms and with educational interventions [p &lt; 0.01]. Further large scale study on national basis has to be undertaken to assess the magnitude of ignorance and to plan awareness programme.</p>
Keywords
Universal precautions, Nosocomial infection, Post-exposure prophylaxis, health-care professionals, Hypochlorite solution, Disposable needle & syringe, Isolation precautions.
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

none

Supporting File
No Pictures
References

none

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.