Article
Case Report

Neha Bagri1*, Sanket Dash2 , Ritu Misra3  

Department of Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi -110029, India.

*Corresponding author:

Dr. Neha Bagri, Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi -110029, India. E-mail: drnehabagri@gmail.com

Received date: July 14, 2021; Accepted date: September 29, 2021; Published date: October 31, 2021

Received Date: 2021-07-14,
Accepted Date: 2021-09-29,
Published Date: 2021-10-31
Year: 2021, Volume: 11, Issue: 4, Page no. 225-230, DOI: 10.26463/rjms.11_4_2
Views: 977, Downloads: 32
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) is a rare devastating malady presenting with amalgam of stunted growth, skeletal anomalies, premature ageing and dermatological changes. We present a case of a 10-year-old boy with classical clinical and imaging findings of this particular genetic disease along with description of considerable differential diagnosis. He had distinctive facial morphology with a gigantic head, slender nose with pointed tip, small-sized chin, abnormal dentition, coxa valga deformity and sclerodermatous changes. The key teaching points for radiological diagnosis of an ultra-rare premature aging syndrome - Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome with captivating illustrations have been presented. Sufficing knowledge of the imaging findings explicitly helps in excluding other premature ageing syndromes at diagnosis. 

<p>Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) is a rare devastating malady presenting with amalgam of stunted growth, skeletal anomalies, premature ageing and dermatological changes. We present a case of a 10-year-old boy with classical clinical and imaging findings of this particular genetic disease along with description of considerable differential diagnosis. He had distinctive facial morphology with a gigantic head, slender nose with pointed tip, small-sized chin, abnormal dentition, coxa valga deformity and sclerodermatous changes. The key teaching points for radiological diagnosis of an ultra-rare premature aging syndrome - Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome with captivating illustrations have been presented. Sufficing knowledge of the imaging findings explicitly helps in excluding other premature ageing syndromes at diagnosis.&nbsp;</p>
Keywords
Hutchinson-Gilford syndrome, Premature ageing, Progeria, Case Report
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

Introduction

Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome is an exceptionally, unheard of, calamitous genetic disease, based on the name of Dr. Hutchinson and Dr. Hastings Gilford, who first reported it in 1886 in England.1 The recorded prevalence is one in eight million and if unreported cases are taken into consideration, the estimated birth prevalence comes out to be one in four million.2 According to the estimate of Progeria Research Foundation database, there are 200–250 children living with Progeria worldwide at a point of time, and 172 of them have been identified as of 31st March 2020 residing in 53 countries.3 It is a severe premature aging syndrome, characterized by retarded growth, dwarfism and abnormal onset of scleroderma.4 De novo Sporadic autosomal dominant mutation in LMNA genes is responsible for majority of the cases and inheritance is quite rare.5 It affects males more than females with a ratio of 1.5:1, and Caucasians show strong racial susceptiveness, representing 97% patients.6 The average survival age is 13.5 years (life expectancy about 8–21 years) with associated significant morbidity and premature death due to stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or atherosclerosis.7 We present a rare and interesting case of Progeria with essentially all the imaging findings described in literature till date.

Case Report

A 10-year-old male child presented with progressive history of skin coarsening, sclerodermatous changes over whole body and tendon contractures resulting in fixed flexion deformities of hands and feet. This child was born to non-consanguineous parents with an uneventful antenatal and perinatal history. The abnormal features were apparent before the age of one year. General examination revealed short stature, characteristic facial appearance with beaked nose, retracted mandible, crowded irregularly erupted teeth with micrognathia and loss of subcutaneous fat (Figure 1a & b). The child also had sclerodermatous changes and mottled discoloration all over the trunk and lower limbs along with tendon contractures resulting in fixed flexion deformities of hands and feet (Figure 2). The terminal ends of the fingers of hand and feet appeared stubby (Figure 3). However, the genitals were normal and mental age was corresponding to the chronological age. Biochemical investigations were normal except for elevated serum cholesterol. Based on the history and clinical findings, an interim diagnosis of Progeria was made.

Further, skeletal survey of the patient was planned. Radiographs of the skull showed disproportionate large calvarium with hypoplastic facial bones, small mandible, retrognathia and overcrowding of teeth (Figure 4a & b). Frontal chest radiograph showed sloping slender posterior ribs and resorption of lateral ends of clavicle (Figure 5). Lateral radiograph of the dorso-lumbar spine showed mild concavity along the anterior aspect of vertebral bodies (“fish mouth” vertebra) (Figure 6). Radiograph of both hands and feet antero-posterior view showed resorption of terminal phalanges with preservation of soft tissue along with flexion deformities at interphalangeal and ankle joints (Figure 7a & b). Radiograph of pelvis with both hip joints anteroposterior view showed increased neck shaft angle (coxa valga deformity), abnormal outline of bilateral femoral head and slender proximal femoral shafts (Figure 8). Radiograph of both knee joints in antero-posterior view showed mild genu valgum deformity (Figure 9). The bones appeared mildly osteopenic in all the radiographs.

Based on the clinical and imaging findings, a diagnosis of Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria syndrome was made. Typical clinical and imaging findings help differentiating it from other premature aging syndromes.

Discussion

Progeria is a premature aging syndrome. The term Progeria, derived from the Greek word “geros” meaning old was framed by Gilford in 1904. De Busk in 1972 renamed this condition as “Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria syndrome”. As compared to normal individuals, the ageing process is seven times faster in affected individuals. De novo autosomal dominant mutation in the LMNA gene (located on band 1q21.1-1q21.3) is responsible for majority of the cases.8 Rarely, autosomal recessive or maternal transmission could be seen. This mutant gene causes aberrant cell division along with abnormal formation and remodelling of collagen and extra cellular matrix. The hyaluronic acid levels are abnormally high, leading to cardiovascular abnormalities and sclerodermatous changes. Also, there are high levels of serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and reduced levels of HDL cholesterol.9

The earliest manifestation is growth deficiency during infancy. These patients exhibit short stature, characteristic facies which include beaked nose with “sculptured nasal tip”, abnormal dentition, receding chin, exophthalmos alopecia and prominent scalp veins in first two years of life.6 Sclerodermatous changes manifest initially in the gluteal region and proximal extremities. Cutaneous manifestations precede the involvement of skeletal and cardiovascular systems. Muscular atrophy with joint deformities are additional features. Lower limb involvement with valgus deformity and mid flexion leads to a “horse riding” stance.10 However, bone age and intellect remains normal.11 With all these features the child had a distinctive physiognomy of “a wizened little old man.”

Radiographic changes manifest within the second year of life. A review of the previously published imaging findings in progeria revealed marked synonymity.12 Typical skull radiograph findings are fragile, gigantic calvarium, shallow diploe space, wormian bones, small mandible with infantile obtuse angle, short ascending rami, hypo plastic facial bones, open cranial fontanelles and prominent vascular markings. Chest radiograph reveals thin short clavicles and abnormal delicate ribs involving the posterior segments of the upper ribs. Limb radiographs show frail long bones, coxa valga, and gradual acroosteolysis of the terminal phalanges. All these findings were observed in the present case, except wormian bones. The common hip manifestations include coxa magna, coxa valga, acetabular dysplasia, bizarre greater trochanters, hip subluxation and dislocation.13 Rarely, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, splayed long bone metaphysis/epiphysis, expanded capitulum of the distal humerus have also been reported. Bilateral coxa valga deformity was seen in the present case.

Differential diagnosis would include Werner syndrome (Progeria adultorum), Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, Acrogeria and Cockayne syndrome, which can be comprehended and differentiated by their clinical findings (Table 1).

Long-duration follow-up is needed to monitor the cardiovascular and skeletal abnormalities in these patients. Survival is unlikely after the second decade and cause of death is commonly myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure. Other common complications include decreased bone density, pathological fractures, aberrant dentition and malnourishment. Till date, no definitive treatment is available and patients are managed conservatively.

Conclusion

Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome is a rare premature aging syndrome with distinctive clinical and radiographic findings. Typical imaging findings can help differentiating it from other premature aging syndromes. We have illustrated typical radiographic features of progeria syndrome which is an extremely rare genetic disorder. Intriguing insight into the radiological features can guide in excluding progeria mimics. The oddity of this malady and finite scope of literature prompted us to report this case.

Abbreviations

Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS)

Conflict of Interest

None. 

Supporting Files
References
  1. Hutchinson J. Case of congenital absence of hair, with atrophic condition of the skin and its appendages, in a boy whose mother had been almost wholly bald from alopecia areata from the age of six. Lancet 1886;1:473-77.
  2. Pollex RL, Hegele RA. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Clin Genet 2004;66:375-81.
  3. Progeria Research Foundation (PRF) web page, http: //www.progeriaresearch.org assets /files /pdf/ PRF-By-the-Numbers-Apr - 2020-Update.pdf.
  4. Mallikarjunappa B, Chandan G, Biradar N, Singh MK. Progeria: A case report with review of literature. JIMSA 2015;28:34-35.
  5. Kashyap S, Shanker V, Sharma N. Hutchinson -Gilford progeria syndrome: A rare case report. Indian Dermatol Online J 2014;5:478-81.
  6. DeBusk FL. The Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Report of 4 cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr 1972;80:697–724.
  7. Pereira S, Bourgeois P, Navarro C et al. HGPS and related premature aging disorders: From genomic identification to the first therapeutic approaches. Mech Ageing Dev 2008;129:449–59.
  8. Pollex RL, Hegele RA. Hutchinson – Gilford progeria syndrome. Clin Genet 2004;66:375-81.
  9. Sarkar PK, Shinton RA. Hutchinson-Guilford progeria syndrome. Postgrad Med J 2001;77: 312-17.
  10. Hamer L, Kaplan F, Fallon M. The musculoskeletal manifestations of progeria. A literature review. Orthopedics 1988;11:763-69.
  11. Merideth MA, Gordon LB, Clauss S, Sachdev V, Smith AC, Perry MB, et al. Phenotype and course of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. N Engl J Med 2008;358:592-604. 
  12. Ullrich NJ, Silvera VM, Campbell SE, Gordon LB. Craniofacial abnormalities in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria syndrome. Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33:1512-18.
  13. Akhbari P, Jha S, James KD, Hinves BL, Buchanan JA. Hip pathology in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;21:563–66. 
We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.