Article
Cover
Journal Cover Page

RGUHS Nat. J. Pub. Heal. Sci Vol: 14  Issue: 4 eISSN:  pISSN

Article Submission Guidelines

Dear Authors,
We invite you to watch this comprehensive video guide on the process of submitting your article online. This video will provide you with step-by-step instructions to ensure a smooth and successful submission.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Short Review

Shekar Shobana1 , Krishnan Amudhalakshmi2 , 3 Golla Usha Rao3*, Monisha Khatri4*

1Reader, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Tagore Dental College and Hospital, Chennai
2Professor, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Chennai
3Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Chennai
4Senior Lecturer, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Chennai

Corresponding author:

Dr Golla Usha Rao, Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Chennai- 600003. Email: Urmds99@gmail.com

Received date: January 14, 2021; Accepted date: March 16, 2021; Published date: March 31, 2021

Received Date: 2021-01-14,
Accepted Date: 2021-03-16,
Published Date: 2021-03-31
Year: 2021, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Page no. 113-116, DOI: 10.26463/rjms.11_2_11
Views: 2007, Downloads: 39
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Though coronavirus disease (COVID) alarm is handled meticulously; this pandemic situation has escalated the consumption of various non-woven single-use plastic-based polymers in the form of personal protective equipment, masks, and gloves, etc. When these healthcare wastes are disposed, the major negative aspects of secondary environment catastrophes associated with biomedical waste management (BMW) are emerging as a new issue to tackle. Environmental performance index is globally jeopardized due to this hazardous waste management. This review highlights the consequences of unplanned environmental disposal of medical waste, the threats posed to our ecosystem by this unprecedented situation, and the various eco-friendly options available to handle the current scenario.

<p>Though coronavirus disease (COVID) alarm is handled meticulously; this pandemic situation has escalated the consumption of various non-woven single-use plastic-based polymers in the form of personal protective equipment, masks, and gloves, etc. When these healthcare wastes are disposed, the major negative aspects of secondary environment catastrophes associated with biomedical waste management (BMW) are emerging as a new issue to tackle. Environmental performance index is globally jeopardized due to this hazardous waste management. This review highlights the consequences of unplanned environmental disposal of medical waste, the threats posed to our ecosystem by this unprecedented situation, and the various eco-friendly options available to handle the current scenario.</p>
Keywords
Eco-friendly, Personnel protective equipment, Green dentistry, Biomedical waste management, COVID
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

Introduction

A huge magnitude of medical waste is generated due to the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. For instance, hospitals in Wuhan generated six-fold more hospital wastes during the pandemic.1 India, alone generates about 608 tonnes of healthcare waste per day.2 Healthcare waste can be defined as “all the waste generated by healthcare facilities, medical laboratories, and biomedical research facilities, as well as waste from minor or scattered sources, such as home health care.”3 Healthcare wastes is also defined as “any waste, hazardous or not, generated during the diagnosis, treatment, or immunization of humans or animals; or waste generated in research related to the aforementioned activities; or waste generated in the production or testing of biologicals.”4 Healthcare waste can be categorized according to the following general classifications:5

  • Sharps waste
  • Pathological waste
  • Other infectious waste
  • Pharmaceutical waste, including cytotoxic waste
  • Hazardous chemical waste • Radioactive waste
  • General (non-risk) waste5

Discussion

Personal protective equipment (PPE), such as face masks, gloves, goggles, gowns, and aprons have become indispensable items to help protect healthcare professionals from exposure to contaminants and pathogens. Traditionally, the use of PPE was intended for hospital environment for protection against harmful microorganisms. The COVID-19 pandemic has entailed the need to use PPE even in domestic scenario.6 This has led to insufficiency in the supply chain, and a rapid aggregation of potentially infectious PPE in domestic solid waste streams.

The production of plastic-based PPE equipment has seen a rapid surge since the COVID-19 outbreak. Between 2016 and 2020, the compound rate of rise in the global market per annum for PPE was 6.5%, ie, from approximately $40-$58 billion.7 On the contrary, the World Health Organization (WHO) projected that the supply of PPE must increase by 40% per month to deal the COVID-19 pandemic efficiently. The essential PPE encompasses an estimation of 89 million medical masks, 76 million pairs of medical gloves, and 1.6 million pairs of goggles and face shields. The demand for PPE is expected to increase further substantially even after the post-pandemic era, with an estimated compound annual growth of 20% in facial and surgical masks supply from 2020-2025.8

COVID and its impact on dental practice

The generation of non-woven material has drastically increased in the dental set up as most of the dental treatment procedures are aerosol generating and carries a risk of transmission of the novel COVID.9 Apart from this, the other consumables used by dentists as PPE, such as gloves, head caps, foot covers, chair covers, X-ray sleeves, patient protective equipment, such as plastic drapes, polyethylene gloves, foot covers, and tray sheets that hold the instruments, cling films, tissues, disposable paper cups, and autoclavable pouches also see a surge in consumption as dental personnel prefer the utilization of disposable products over the reusable ones owing to the stringent precautions required while handling the reusable PPEs and other auxiliary dental products. There is also a demand for more manpower and equipment to disinfect and sterilize the reusable PPEs. Thus, the gravity of the pandemic has increased the gap between eco-friendly dentistry and dental practice. Ecofriendly dentistry, synonymously known as green dentistry is an approach to dentistry that implements sustainable practices by keeping resource consumption in line with nature’s economy, safeguarding the external environment, virtue of eliminating or reducing outgoing wastes, and promoting the wellbeing of all those in the clinical environment by conscious reduction of the chemicals in the breathable air.10 This review focuses on how the ongoing pandemic has changed the very face of dental waste generation and methods to overcome these to redeem green dentistry.

Composition of PPE

Majority of the PPE comprise of polymeric plastics in their composition, such as polypropylene (PP), polyethylene pteryphthalate (PET), and polyethylene (PE).11 Other common plastics in healthcare waste are low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene, and polystyrene.12 However, as much as 40% of plastic waste in modern hospitals is chlorinated plastics. Decreasing the percentage of halogenated plastics (such as polyvinyl chloride) reduces the amounts of hydrogen chloride and other halogenated pollutants emitted during combustion.11

Unfortunately, many polyvinyl chloride products, such as intravenous bags, tubing, gloves, and enteral feeding sets, are not labelled. The frequent start-up and shut down operations of medical waste incinerators could lower incineration temperatures and cause an increased formation of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), such as dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, furans, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHS), which are proved to be carcinogenic.13

Strategies for sustainable practice

The various approaches towards sustainable practice can be dealt with in three different dimensions: personnel level, practice level, sterilization, and biomedical waste management (Table 1).

Current trends towards greener alternatives

  • Green PET films: PET films constitute 30% of mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) usually extracted from non-renewable petro-based feedstock is now replaced by green MEG that is sourced from bio-ethanol made from renewable agro inputs. These are called green PET films and are the world’s first polyester product for sustainability.15
  • Biological methods of biomedical waste disposal: The emerging system, Bioconverter (Biomedical Disposal, Inc.) uses a solution of enzyme to decontaminate medical waste. The sludge generated is processed through an extruder to remove water for sewage disposal. The remaining solid waste is sent to landfill.16,17

Environmentally friendly BMW disposal

  • Microwave energy: Microwave energy generates moist heat and steam generated, which is used for sterilizing all infectious waste, including human, laboratory, and soft wastes (gauze, bandages, and gowns); and sharps are sterilized in microwave. Microwave used for biomedical waste disposal has the advantage of minimal emissions.18
  • Plasma pyrolysis: Plasma energy is generated from plasma torches. In plasma state, the ionized gas conducts electric current and produces heat energy due to its high resistance. Infectious waste, sharps, plastics, dialysis waste, hazardous waste, chemotherapeutic waste, chemotherapy waste, and lowlevel radioactive waste can be sterilized with plasma-based technology. This system has low emission rate, waste residue is inert and sterile, ie, environment friendly, and there is reduction in volume (95%) and mass (80%-90%).19
  • Lynntech’s ozone technology: Ozone is a strong oxidant; it destroys microbes and converts it into molecular oxygen.19
  • Ionizing radiation: This causes damage to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), proteins, and enzymes of microbes by producing free radicals. The waste to be treated are infectious wastes, including human waste, laboratory waste, soft waste (gauze, bandages, and gowns), and sharps. This technique does not produce toxic emission, no liquid effluent, and no ionizing radiation when the equipment is switched off.19
  • Biodegradable plastics for waste management: Many biomedical implants built with biodegradable plastics undergo biological degradation with microbial extracellular enzymes. These microbes utilize these biodegradable polymers as substrate under starvation and in unavailability of suitable substrate. Further research needs to be done for largescale economic manufacture of biodegradable plastics.19

Conclusion

The quantitative data on the healthcare waste generated at hospital and domestic levels is sparse. The data on this is kept at municipal/corporation/national levels. Much of this equipment is not even properly collected and is right now almost certainly making its way into unmanaged dumpsites in the environment and being burned openly. The magnitude of the impact of COVID has been so huge in the sudden demand in manpower and personnel that the focus has been channelized on rising to this crisis and other aspects, as BMW and recycling of medical wastes have taken a back seat. Success in integrated healthcare waste management will gear our progress towards meeting many of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), especially to mention— SDG 3 - good health and wellbeing, SDG 6 - clean water and sanitation, SDG 8 - decent work and economic growth, SDG 12 - responsible consumption and production, and SDG 13 - climate action. Thus, emphasizing on the hazards of the consumables used in the dental office and efforts to effectively plan the procurement and utilization of the same is the need of the hour.

Conflict of Interest

None. 

Supporting File
References
  1. Theverge.com [Internet]. New York: The COVID-19 pandemic is generating tons of medical waste. Sanitation workers need personal protective equipment too; c2020 [cited 2020 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.theverge.com/.
  2. United Nations Environment Program [Internet]. Tsukiji M, Gamaralalage PJD, Pratomo ISY, Onogawa K, Alverson K, Honda S; et al. Waste Management during the COVID-19 WMC 19: Pandemic from Response to Recovery. ISBN No: 978-92-807-3794-3 Job No: DTI/2292/PA.
  3. Chertier Y, Emmanuel J, Pieper U, Priss A, Rush brook P, Stringer R; et al. Safe management of waste from health-care activities, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  4. Bio-medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, Second Amendment, Ministry of Environment and Forests, India, 2000.
  5. Alverson K. How COVID-19 Pandemic is Changing Waste Management. J Health Manag 2020;20(4):332-4.
  6. Ogunseitan OA. The Materials Genome and COVID-19 Pandemic. JOM 2020:1-3. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11837-020-04207-3.
  7. Market Reports. Personal Protective Equipment Market by Type (Hands & Arm Protection, Protective Clothing, Foot & Leg Protection, Respiratory Protection, Head Protection), End-Use Industry (Manufacturing, Construction, Oil & Gas, Healthcare) -Global Forecast to 2022. https://www. marketsandmarkets.com/ Market-Reports/personalprotective-equipment-market-132681971. html. 2019 (accessed 2020/9/11).
  8. WHO, Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide? https://www. who.int/news-room/detail/ 03-03-2020-shortage-ofpersonal-protective-equipment-endangeringhealthworkers-worldwide. 2020 (accessed 2020/9/11).
  9. Dave M, Seoudi N, Coulthard P. Urgent dental care for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2020;395(10232):1257.
  10. Dixit K, Dixit KK, Kapoor N. Ecofriendly dentistry: A reality. J Dent Sci Oral Rehabil 2013;1:56.
  11. Shimasaki N, Shinohara K, Morikawa H. Performance of materials used for biological personal protective equipment against blood splash penetration. Ind Health 2017;55(6):521-8.
  12. Emmanuel J. Compendium of Technologies for Treatment / Destruction of Healthcare Waste. www.unep.org. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/ handle/20.500.11822/8628/IETC_Compendium_Technologies_Treatment_Destruction_Healthcare_ Waste.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y (accessed 09/17/2020)
  13. Lee WS, Chang-Chien GP, Wang LC, Lee WJ, Tsai PJ, Chen CK. Emissions of polychlorinated dibenzop-dioxins and dibenzofurans from the incinerations of both medical and municipal solid wastes. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2003;3(1):1-6.
  14. Passi S, Bhalla S. Go green dentistry. J Educ Ethics Dent 2012;2:102.
  15. https://www.uflexltd.com/packaging-filmsenvironmental-sustainability.php 
  16. Emmanuel J. NonIncineration Medical Waste Treatment Technologies. Washington, DC: Health Care without Harm; 2001.
  17. Roohi, Bano K, Kuddus M, Zaheer MR, Zia Q, Khan MF, et al. Microbial enzymatic degradation of biodegradable plastics. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2017;18(5):42940.
  18. . Datta P, Mohi GK, Chander J. Biomedical waste management in India: Critical appraisal. J Lab Physicians 2018;10(1):6-14.
  19. Emmanuel J. NonIncineration Medical Waste Treatment Technologies. Washington, DC: Health Care without Harm; 2001.
  20. HCWH, Health Care Waste Management and the Sustainable Development Goals. https:// noharm-global.org/issues/global/healthcare- wastemanagement-and-sustainable-development-goals (accessed 2020/10/18).
HealthMinds Logo
RGUHS Logo

© 2024 HealthMinds Consulting Pvt. Ltd. This copyright specifically applies to the website design, unless otherwise stated.

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.