Article
Original Article

Nitesh Baral, Pearlson K*

Padmashree Institute of Physiotherapy, Sy. No. 149, Kommaghatta, Sulikere Post, Kengeri, Bengaluru – 560060

*Corresponding author:

Dr. Pearlson K, Professor, Padmashree Institute of Physiotherapy, Sy. No. 149, Kommaghatta, Sulikere Post, Kengeri, Bengaluru – 560060 Affiliated to Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka

Received date: March 16, 2021; Accepted date: March 22, 2021; Published date: March 31, 2021

Received Date: 2021-03-16,
Accepted Date: 2021-03-22,
Published Date: 2021-03-31
Year: 2021, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Page no. 1-6, DOI: 10.26463/rjpt.1_1_3
Views: 1911, Downloads: 167
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Introduction: Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is most frequently accounted musculoskeletal injury characterized by pain, swelling and tenderness on the lateral aspect of ankle joint that is caused due to excessive inversion of foot at a high velocity which can lead to loss of function, decrease movement and painful limping. The injury also has impact on psychological and physiological aspects that can further affect decrease physical activity thus, leading to functional instability.

Materials and methods: A total of 30 male subjects within the age group of 18-35 years with the history of lateral ankle sprain more than once on the same limb, positive talar and anterior drawer test were assigned randomly in two groups after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They participated in 4 weeks of intervention for 3 times a week in focus to fear of re-injury and functional performance. Experimental group performed strengthening exercise with proprioceptive training while control group performed only strengthening exercises. Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK), functional performance tests (FPT) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to assess fear of re-injury, functional performance and pain respectively prior and post treatment.

Results: Proprioceptive training with strengthening exercises and strengthening exercises only on fear of re-injury and functional performance in athletes with LAS showed statistically significant improvement individually within both the group (p<0.001) and while comparing in between the groups (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Study showed improvement in both the groups. Statistical analysis indicated that subjects who received strengthening exercises with proprioceptive training was more effective than strengthening exercises only

Take home message: Any ligament injuries especially lateral ligament of ankle that undergoes recurrent injuries should be assessed about mechanical and psychological aspect of athlete which also can be addressed by incorporating graded forms of proprioceptive and strengthening exercises in rehabilitation.

<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is most frequently accounted musculoskeletal injury characterized by pain, swelling and tenderness on the lateral aspect of ankle joint that is caused due to excessive inversion of foot at a high velocity which can lead to loss of function, decrease movement and painful limping. The injury also has impact on psychological and physiological aspects that can further affect decrease physical activity thus, leading to functional instability.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods:</strong> A total of 30 male subjects within the age group of 18-35 years with the history of lateral ankle sprain more than once on the same limb, positive talar and anterior drawer test were assigned randomly in two groups after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They participated in 4 weeks of intervention for 3 times a week in focus to fear of re-injury and functional performance. Experimental group performed strengthening exercise with proprioceptive training while control group performed only strengthening exercises. Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK), functional performance tests (FPT) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to assess fear of re-injury, functional performance and pain respectively prior and post treatment.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Proprioceptive training with strengthening exercises and strengthening exercises only on fear of re-injury and functional performance in athletes with LAS showed statistically significant improvement individually within both the group (p&lt;0.001) and while comparing in between the groups (p&lt;0.05).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Study showed improvement in both the groups. Statistical analysis indicated that subjects who received strengthening exercises with proprioceptive training was more effective than strengthening exercises only</p> <p><strong>Take home message: </strong>Any ligament injuries especially lateral ligament of ankle that undergoes recurrent injuries should be assessed about mechanical and psychological aspect of athlete which also can be addressed by incorporating graded forms of proprioceptive and strengthening exercises in rehabilitation.</p>
Keywords
Athletes, Fear of re-injury, Functional performance, Lateral ankle sprain, Proprioceptive training
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

Introduction

The LAS is the frequently accounted musculoskeletal injuries among sports-related and recreational athletes.1 It has been found that in United Kingdom (UK) 85% of ankle sprains are LAS during sporting activities where patients less than 25 years of age sustained more injuries on fields with the incidence rate of 7 LAS per 1000.2 Lateral ligament complex consists of fan like system of 3 structures which are anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL) that functions to resist the ankle inversion and also providing the controlled talus movement with ATFL checking the anterior subluxation, CFL to varus tilting and PTFL limiting excessive posterior displacement.1,3 When an ankle undergoes excessive inversion at a high velocity it can lead to tear or stretching to lateral ligaments also called sprain or LAS.4,5 Anatomically, medial malleolus are shorter than the lateral malleolus that allows the talus to go towards inversion than eversion1 .

Ankle rehabilitation is structured and individualized. Cryotherapy, external pressures, active range of motion (ROM) exercises done initially are followed by pain-free ROM, weight bearing and balance exercises to normalize neuromuscular control, muscle strength, power and endurance to reach pre injury levels. Treatment eyes on re-gaining the normal joint functioning and specific exercises are focused which will be performed during the particular sport.6 LAS is significantly associated with distal fibular anterior positional fault which determined in relation with distal tibia. Thus, it is suggested to assess the mobility and position of distal fibula after acute ankle sprain and managed by methods like fibular mobilizations to enhance ROM.7

Proprioception is the sense of joint position and movements that arises through sensory neurons which are located in skin, muscles, joints, tendons and ligaments8 that includes both afferent and efferent signals to maintain stability, orientation and prevent injuries during activities. Proprioceptive training challenges the joints ability to detect and react the afferent input about joint position. Mechanoreceptors around ligaments, joint capsules activates more during end range movements and gets disrupted during injury. Ligament heals with collagen tissue post injury becomes stable mechanically but the healing of nervous tissue that is disrupted generally takes more time as nervous tissue healing is slow which finally results in decrease joint position sense leading to functional instability. Growing evidence supports reoccurrence of injury is due to impaired joint proprioception9,10 and proprioceptive exercises are capable of reducing instability and improving the functional outcomes.11

Injured athlete undergoes with various physical impairments like decrease strength and ROM, pain and psychological impacts like anxiety, depression, frustration, tension, decrease self- esteem and fear of re-injury which alters the return to sports time frame. Fear of re-injury is a fear of being susceptible to painful re-occurrence of injury though physical recovery is achieved. It has physiological effect on muscle guarding and psychological changes like distractions and lack of confidence towards injured site. Studies support that fear of re-injury also affects muscle recruitment and muscle activation patterns which influences neuromuscular functioning and affects the rehabilitation outcomes. Consequently, return to sports is delayed.12,13. Tampa scale of kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) is a 11-statement 4-point likert scale questionnaire designed for chronic pain populations to assess fear of re-injury. Total scores ranges from 11 to 44 where higher scores signifies greater fear of re-injury.14

Functional performance deficits can decrease physical activities and results in other injuries. Studies has shown that functional performance deficits exists in individuals with feeling of giving away and functional performance tests (FPTs) are equitable means for testing functional ability, functional loss, tenderness and significant ligament instability.1,15

Studies shows that negative emotion requires better cognitive neural processing in several regions of brain that are also essential for maintaining dynamic joint stability. Thus, increased neural demands due to high fear of re-injury can disrupt neuromuscular control.16 Though proprioceptive training acts on neuromuscular complex and joint movement sense there is lack of literature towards effect of proprioceptive training on fear of re-injury in LAS athletes which has chances of high reoccurrences and has been a hindrance for many athletes for returning to sports with same level of fitness as before.

Methods

Study design and procedure:

Pre-post experimental study design was used with athlete completing the self-reported TSK-11 scale to evaluate fear of re-injury in heterogeneous chronic pain population14 and functional performance tests (4-single limb hop test) with visual analog scale (VAS) was taken prior and after intervention. Instructions were given to athletes to perform quickly and best of 3 trials was taken in cases like any contralateral foot falls then athletes were asked to do retrials 17,18. Also, athletes received a standard history, physical examination and special tests by physiotherapist.

Study participants and sampling:

Simple random sampling was used for selecting the samples in 2 different groups. Male athletes with history of lateral ankle injury more than once on same limb underage group 18-35 years showing positive anterior drawer and talar tilt tests were eligible under study. Subjects with visual difficulties, medial ankle sprain, lower limb fracture, concomitant injuries or pathology19 and neurological conditions were excluded.

Study instruments and measures:

Towel, wobble board, elastic band, ball, marker, cones

Strengthening exercises: (Hold for 30 s, rest for 10 s, and repeat exercise 15 time 2 sets)

  • Soleus and gastrocnemius stretch
  • Calf stretch
  • Tubing exercises and weight around ankle in sitting position (dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, inversion, eversion)
  • Toe raises, stairs exercises20

Outcome measure:

  • Tampa scale of kinesiophobia to assess fear of reinjury.
  • FPT to assess functional performance.

Data analysis:

Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS-17 for windows with alpha value was set as 0.05. Descriptive statistics was performed to find out mean, standard deviation for the demographic variable and outcome variables. Chi square test was performed to find out dominance among both groups. Unpaired t-test was used to find significant differences among demographic variable such as age and between group for FPT. MannWhitney U test was used for difference in scores between groups for TSK and VAS. Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used to find significant difference with in groups for TSK and VAS. Paired t-test was used to find significant differences within group for FPT. Microsoft excel, Msword was used to generate tables.

Results:

A total 30 athletes met the inclusion criteria, randomized into 2 different groups and undergone test process.

Discussion

The LAS has been known for its often reoccurrences and progressing to chronic ankle instability leading to off, from sporting and many functional activities. We attempted to verify by analyzing TSK-11, FPT and VAS scale prior to and after the intervention. Assessment was taken prior to and after the intervention. Anterior drawer and talar tilt test was performed to rule out the lateral ligament injury.

The result of current study showed significant differences post interventions as the level of confidence, self-esteem seemed high since athletes have performed the tasks that was far challenging to them post-injury. This intern can decrease negative emotions and could facilitate neuromuscular control since cognitive neural processing in brains several areas responsible for maintaining both. Also, increase impact on muscle recruitment and activation patterns, muscular endurance and influence on neuromuscular functioning and instability. Thus, improving balance and normalizing position sense.11,12

Literature by Yong Woo An, where executive function training improved affective control and muscle coordination16 backing present study findings of proprioceptive training decreasing the psychological aspect of fear in athletes thus improving performance. Proprioceptive training protocol with graded forms of easy to high level training given provides more impact on neuromuscular control and on cognitive neural processing of brains region thus decreasing negative emotion or fear and FPTs again providing a feedback post intervention scale signifying a better quantitative results with positive effect.

Erik A. Wikstrom (2011)21 with contradictory findings, fear of re-injury does not differ those with and without CAI with TSK-17 scale also noted decrease in confidence in CAI, while present study focuses on TSK-11 which has same validity and reliability as pervious TSK scales but includes 6 less psychometrically poor items than TSK-17.14

Control groups showed significant results with improved muscular firing and recruitment pattern with strength training that helped to regain strength, hence confidence to have a significant values.12Also, can be due to increase in evert or muscles concentric and eccentric strength to counteract the foot when goes towards inversion injury22.Similarly, relationship between muscle spindle sensitivity and ankle strengthening training on joint position sense23 shows positive correlation decreasing TSK value. The LAS athletes were homogeneous in TSK, FPT and VAS in both the groups. While comparing the post test scores of TSK in between the groups, the mean and SD of post TSK in group-A was decreased to 18.87±2.39 and in group-B was reduced to 21.47±3.38. Similarly, the post test scores of FPT in between the groups, group-A declined to 80.07±4.28 and group-B was lessened to 84.20±3.82. Likewise, post test scores of VAS in between the groups, group-A dropped to 1.03±0.90 and in group-B decreased to 1.87±0.52. As proprioceptive training challenges joints ability to detect and react the afferent input about joint position and this challenges helps to reconnect the slow healing process of nervous tissue and enhance the neuromuscular functioning and thus decrease the subjective instability While strength training aids to counteract the stress on lateral ligament.11,12

Hence, both the group has positive improvement on fear of re-injury and functional performance but experimental group can be effective strategy to cope with fear of reinjury and to perform better in functional abilities.

Study limitations were smaller sample size, timely follow up, postural alignments and faulty biomechanics was not focused, and reporting bias.

Recommendations: Objective scale to assess fear of re-injury, large population with both genders can be considered.

Conclusion

Both groups were found to be clinically significant. After statistical analysis, strengthening exercises with proprioceptive training was more effective than strengthening exercises only. Therefore, addressing proprioceptive training in rehabilitation of LAS is very effective to prevent reoccurrences and fear of movements.

Conflicts of interest

Declared.

Supporting Files
No Pictures
References
  1. Nuhmani S, Khan MH. Lateral ankle sprain: A review. Saudi Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014; 14(1):14.
  2. Ferran NA, Maffulli N. Epidemiology of sprains of the lateral ankle ligament complex. Foot and ankle clinics. 2006;11(3):659-62.
  3. Bradman H, Clark AN, Kumar CS. The sporting ankle: an update. Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2020; 34(1):17-22.
  4. Herb CC, Hertel J. Current concepts on the pathophysiology and management of recurrent ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports. 2014; 2(1):25-34.
  5. Dubin JC, Comeau D, McClelland RI, Dubin RA, Ferrel E. Lateral and syndesmotic ankle sprain injuries: a narrative literature review. Journal of chiropractic medicine. 2011; 10(3):204-19.
  6. Mattacola CG, Dwyer MK. Rehabilitation of the ankle after acute sprain or chronic instability. Journal of athletic training. 2002; 37(4):413.
  7. Hubbard TJ, Hertel J. Anterior positional fault of the fibula after sub-acute lateral ankle sprains. Manual therapy. 2008; 13(1):63-7.
  8. Grigg P. Peripheral neural mechanisms in proprioception. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 1994; 3(1):2-17.
  9. Schiftan GS, Ross LA, Hahne AJ. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training in preventing ankle sprains in sporting populations: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2015; 18(3):238-44.
  10. Hertel J. Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain. Sports medicine. 2000; 29(5):361-71.
  11. Postle K, Pak D, Smith TO. Effectiveness of proprioceptive exercises for ankle ligament injury in adults: a systematic literature and meta-analysis. Manual therapy. 2012; 17(4):285-91.
  12. Hsu CJ, Meierbachtol A, George SZ, Chmielewski TL. Fear of reinjury in athletes: implications for rehabilitation. Sports health. 2017; 9(2):162-7.
  13. Logan B. Fear of Re-injury.Psychology of Sports Injuries. https://injurypsychology.wordpress.com/ 2013/10/16/fear-of-re-injury/
  14. Hapidou EG, O’Brien MA, Pierrynowski MR, de las Heras E, Patel M, Patla T. Fear and avoidance of movement in people with chronic pain: psychometric properties of the 11-Item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). Physiotherapy Canada. 2012; 64(3):235-41.
  15. Beynnon BD, Renström PA, Haugh L, Uh BS, Barker H. A prospective, randomized clinical investigation of the treatment of first-time ankle sprains. The American journal of sports medicine. 2006; 34(9):1401-12.
  16. An YW. Fear of reinjury matters after ACL injury. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences. 2018; 30(2).
  17. . Ko J, Rosen AB, Brown CN. Functional performance deficits in adolescent athletes with a history of lateral ankle sprain (s). Physical Therapy in Sport. 2018; 33:125-32.
  18. Caffrey E, Docherty CL, Schrader J, Klossner J. The ability of 4 single-limb hopping tests to detect functional performance deficits in individuals with functional ankle instability. Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2009; 39(11):799-806.
  19. Vuurberg G, Hoorntje A, Wink LM, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of ankle sprains: update of an evidence-based clinical guideline. Br J Sports Med. 2018;1;52(15):956.
  20. Ktaiche J, Bassal A, Kalach A. Validity of proprioceptive rehabilitation for ankle instability based on freeman board training. European Scientific Journal. 2015; 7881(7):370-88.
  21. Wikstrom EA. Fear of re-injury does not differ between those with and without chronic ankle instability. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2011; 10(4):771.
  22. Willems T, Witvrouw E, Verstuyft J, Vaes P, De Clercq D. Proprioception and muscle strength in subjects with a history of ankle sprains and chronic instability. Journal of athletic training. 2002; 37(4):487.
  23. Docherty CL, Moore JH, Arnold BL. Effects of strength training on strength development and joint position sense in functionally unstable ankles. Journal of athletic training. 1998; 33(4):310. 
We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.