Article
Cover
RJDS Journal Cover Page

RGUHS Nat. J. Pub. Heal. Sci Vol No: 16 Issue No: 3   pISSN: 

Article Submission Guidelines

Dear Authors,
We invite you to watch this comprehensive video guide on the process of submitting your article online. This video will provide you with step-by-step instructions to ensure a smooth and successful submission.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Original Article

Umme Azher1*, Vijayashree C2 , Santhosh T Paul3 , Divya C Reddy4

1 Professor, Department of Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Cholanagar, Hebbal, Bengaluru-560032, Karnataka, India.

2 Pediatric Dentist, Bengaluru.

3 Professor & Head, Department of Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Cholanagar, Hebbal, Bengaluru-560032, Karnataka, India.

4 Professor, Department of Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Cholanagar, Hebbal, Bengaluru-560032, Karnataka, India.

*Corresponding author:

Dr. Umme Azher, Professor, Department of Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Cholanagar, Hebbal, Bengaluru-560032, Karnataka, India. E-mail: drummeazher@yahoo.com

Received date: December 7, 2020; Accepted date: July 28, 2021; Published date: October 31, 2021

Year: 2021, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, Page no. 253-257, DOI: 10.26715/rjds.13_4_7
Views: 1232, Downloads: 24
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Background: Dental erosion, an irreversible loss of dental hard tissue by a chemical process without the involvement of bacteria can be caused by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The consumption of foods with a low pH can cause a drop in the pH of the oral cavity below critical pH and its persistence can lead to a potential damage to teeth. As acidic beverages are likely to be a major factor in the etiology of dental erosion, it is important to determine the erosive potential of commonly consumed fruit-based beverages among children and educate the parents of their detrimental effects on teeth.

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the pH and titratable acidity of the commonly consumed fruit-based beverages.

Methodology: Three commonly consumed flavours (Orange, Apple, Mixed fruit) of fruit-based beverages (Group 1 - fresh fruit juice; Group 2 - packed fruit juice; Group 3 - packed fruit drink) were analyzed for pH and titratable acidity. The pH was determined using digital pH meter and the titratable acidity was measured by adding 1M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in increments of 0.2 ml to 100 ml of the freshly prepared/ opened fruit-based beverages until the pH reached 5.5 and 7. The pH reading was measured after each increment (0.2 ml) of NaOH, until a stable pH was achieved. All the measurements were repeated in triplicates.

Results: The pH of all drinks investigated in the present study ranged between 3.29 - 4.43. On comparison of the titratable acidity, packed fruit drink (Group 3) exhibited highest titratable acidity, followed by packed fruit juices (Group 2) and fresh fruit juices (Group 1).

Conclusion: All the fruit-based beverages in the present study exhibited an acidic pH, which was well below the critical pH of 5.5, thereby exhibiting an erosive potential.

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Dental erosion, an irreversible loss of dental hard tissue by a chemical process without the involvement of bacteria can be caused by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The consumption of foods with a low pH can cause a drop in the pH of the oral cavity below critical pH and its persistence can lead to a potential damage to teeth. As acidic beverages are likely to be a major factor in the etiology of dental erosion, it is important to determine the erosive potential of commonly consumed fruit-based beverages among children and educate the parents of their detrimental effects on teeth.</p> <p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the pH and titratable acidity of the commonly consumed fruit-based beverages.</p> <p><strong>Methodology:</strong> Three commonly consumed flavours (Orange, Apple, Mixed fruit) of fruit-based beverages (Group 1 - fresh fruit juice; Group 2 - packed fruit juice; Group 3 - packed fruit drink) were analyzed for pH and titratable acidity. The pH was determined using digital pH meter and the titratable acidity was measured by adding 1M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in increments of 0.2 ml to 100 ml of the freshly prepared/ opened fruit-based beverages until the pH reached 5.5 and 7. The pH reading was measured after each increment (0.2 ml) of NaOH, until a stable pH was achieved. All the measurements were repeated in triplicates.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> The pH of all drinks investigated in the present study ranged between 3.29 - 4.43. On comparison of the titratable acidity, packed fruit drink (Group 3) exhibited highest titratable acidity, followed by packed fruit juices (Group 2) and fresh fruit juices (Group 1).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the fruit-based beverages in the present study exhibited an acidic pH, which was well below the critical pH of 5.5, thereby exhibiting an erosive potential.</p>
Keywords
Dental erosion, Titratable acidity, pH
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

Introduction

The evolution of mankind has brought about drastic changes in the dietary patterns. The diet has become more refined and is associated with a substantial increase in the consumption of carbonated beverages and fruit drinks.1 As the awareness on the deleterious effect of carbonated beverages on the teeth is increasing the preference for more natural and healthy products such as fresh fruit juices have increased. Fruit juices are popular among all age groups, especially children, as they are perceived to be tasty and healthy, leading to an upsurge in the consumption of fruit juices. Also, commercially, packed fruit juices are being marketed aggressively and promoted as “Health Drink”. However, claims of safety of fruit juices for teeth are unsubstantiated.2

Dental erosion is an irreversible loss of dental hard tissue by a chemical process without the involvement of microorganisms and is due to either intrinsic or extrinsic sources.3-5 The dietary factors represent the most important external risk factor for dental erosion in children due to the general high consumption of acidic foods and drinks. Many commonly consumed beverages have pH sufficiently low to erode and soften the enamel surface. Acidic beverages are thus likely to be a major factor in the etiology of dental erosion, which is common among children and adolescents.

The most important parameter of beverages effecting dental erosion is their pH, titratable acidity and their ability to cause dissolution of tooth structure. The pH is a good predictor of the erosive potential of drinks for the first few minutes of erosive challenge, while the titratable acidity characterizes the erosive potential during longer exposure times.

As there is an increase in the consumption of fruit juices, which are considered to be healthy, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the erosive potential of commonly consumed fruit-based beverages among children.

Material & Methods

The present in vitro study was conducted in the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru in collaboration with Analytical Research & Metallurgical Laboratories, KSSIDC complex, Electronic city, Bengaluru following clearance from Institutional Review Board, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru.

Three commonly consumed flavours (Orange, Apple, Mixed fruit,) of the fruit-based beverages (fresh fruit juice, packed fruit juice and packed fruit drink) were selected and divided into three groups as follows:

Group I: Fresh fruit juice (freshly extracted)

Group II: Packed fruit juice (commercially available)

Group III: Packed fruit drink (commercially available)

The fruit-based beverages were analyzed for pH and titratable acidity. The composition of the fruit juices is as described below.

I. Fresh Fruit Juices: 100% juice (Orange, Apple, Mixed fruit) was freshly extracted without added sugar or water.

II. Packed Fruit Juice (commercially available)

Fruit Juice

Contents (on label)

Orange Juice

Water, 100% pure orange juice (filtered water and concentrated orange juice), contains added flavour (natural orange flavours)

Apple Juice

Water, concentrated apple juice (17%), reconstructed 100% apple juice, contains added flavour (natural apple flavouring substances)

Mixed          fruit

Juice

Water, concentrated mixed fruit juice (24.2%), (apple, mango, guava, orange, banana, apricot, peach) reconstructed 100% fruit juice, contains added flavour (natural flavouring substances)

III. Packed Fruit Drinks (commercially available)

Fruit drink

Contents (on label)

Orange

Orange juice 45% (reconstituted), water, concentrated orange juice 8.2%, sugar, acidity regulator 330, salt, stabilizer 440

Apple

Apple juice 44% (reconstituted), water, concentrated apple juice 7%, sugar, acidity regulator 296

Mixed fruit

Water, concentrated mixed fruit juice 12.2% (banana, apricot, pine apple, mango, orange, apple, lime, strawberry) sugar, acidity

regulator 330, stabilizer 440

Assessment of pH and titratable acidity

The initial pH was determined using a digital pH meter (Hanna, USA). The digital pH meter, with an accuracy of 0.1 was first calibrated according to the manufacturer’s instructions employing buffer standards (pH 4 & 7) at room temperature. The titratable acidity was then measured by adding 1M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in increments of 0.2 ml to 100 ml of the freshly prepared/ opened fruit-based beverages until the pH reached 5.5 and 7. The pH reading was measured after each increment (0.2 ml) of NaOH, until a stable pH was achieved. All the measurements were repeated in triplicates. The collected data was tabulated and comparisons were made amongst the three study groups.

Results

pH assessment

The intra group comparison of the pH of the three study groups is represented in Table 1.

In Group 1 (freshly extracted fruit juice), orange juice exhibited the lowest pH (3.46) followed by mixed fruit (3.88) and apple (4.43). In Group 2 (packed fruit juice), the apple juice (3.72) exhibited lower pH compared to orange juice (3.76) and mixed fruit juice (3.84); while in Group 3 (packed fruit drink), apple juice (3.24) demonstrated lower pH in comparison to mixed fruit juice (3.28), orange juice (3.48).

Titratable acidity

Intra group comparison of the titratable acidity

The intra group comparison of the titratable acidity (ml NaOH) of the three study groups at pH 5.5 and 7 is depicted in Table 2.

In Group 1: Orange juice exhibited the highest titratable acidity of 6.4 and 10.2 at a pH of 5.5 and 7 respectively. The mixed fruit juice demonstrated a titratable acidity of 4.8 and 7.0 at pH of 5.5 and 7 respectively, while the apple juice demonstrated a titratable acidity of 1.4 and 3.4 at pH 5.5 and 7 respectively.

In Group 2: Orange juice exhibited the highest titratable acidity of 8.8 and 15.6 at pH of 5.5 and 7 respectively, followed by apple juice 7.8 and 9.0 at pH of 5.5 and 7 respectively and mixed fruit juice 5.6 and 9.0 at pH of 5.5 and 7 respectively.

In Group 3: Mixed fruit demonstrated the highest titratable acidity of 9.8 and 12.8 at pH of 5.5 and 7 respectively, followed by orange juice 8.2 and 12.2, and apple juice 7.4 and 8.4 at pH of 5.5 and 7 respectively.

Inter group comparison of the titratable acidity

The inter group comparison of the titratable acidity of the three study groups at pH 5.5 and 7 is depicted in Table 3. On intergroup comparison of different flavours, the mixed fruit juice exhibited the highest titratable acidity in Group 3 (9.8 and 12.8) followed by Group 2 (5.6 and 9.0) and Group1 (4.8 and 7.0) at pH 5.5 and 7 respectively.

Orange juice exhibited the highest titratable acidity in Group 2 (8.8 and 15.6) followed by Group 3 (8.2 and 12.2) and Group 1 (6.4 and 10.2) at pH 5.5 and 7 respectively.

Apple juice exhibited the highest titratable acidity in Group 2 (7.8 and 9.0) followed by Group 3 (7.4 and 8.4) and Group1 (1.4and 3.4) at pH 5.5 and 7 respectively.

Discussion

The diet has been the most extensively studied etiologic factor in dental erosion. The mineral loss from teeth and its association with dietary factors may be due to the constantly changing life styles and dietary patterns, which involves increased sugar and acidic exposures in the form of fruit juices or carbonated soft drinks as part of a refined diet. The awareness among parents of the harmful effects of carbonated beverages on the teeth has led to an increased preference for more natural and healthier fresh fruit juices, which are also regarded as a good source of vitamin C. However, as fruits and fruit juices contain a variety of acids that can have a detrimental effect on the teeth, the present in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the erosive potential of commonly consumed fruit based beverages among children.

Two ways to quantify the acid content or the erosive potential of foods and beverages include pH and titratable acidity (neutralizable acidity). The pH or actual acidity is the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration (actual hydrogen ion concentration) and is measured on a scale of 0 to 10, with a reading below 7 indicating an acid content or environment. The neutralizable acidity is regarded a more realistic and accurate method of measuring the potential acidity in a given beverage.6 The pH corresponds to the equilibrium measure of hydrogen ion concentration, but it does not indicate the overall acidic content of the drink or food, whereas, titratable acidity gives a measure of all free hydrogen ions available to cause erosion.7

In the present study, the pH and titratable acidity of three commonly consumed flavours (orange, apple, mixed fruit) of freshly extracted fruit juice and commercially available packed fruit juice and packed fruit drink selected on the basis of a simple market survey was determined. The pH of all drinks investigated in the present study ranged between 3.29 to 4.43, which was well below the critical pH of 5.5 at which enamel dissolution occurs. Also, in the present study packed fruit drink (Group 3) exhibited highest titratable acidity followed by packed fruit juices (Group 2) and fresh fruit juices (Group 1).

Jensdottir et al., (2005)8 observed that fruit juices, especially pure fruit juices had a high titratable acidity and accordingly a high buffer capacity compared to the carbonated soft drinks coca cola. Saeed S et al., (2010)9 on comparison of the erosive potential of fresh orange juices, cola and milk, found that the orange juice showed highest titratable acidity of 41.33 (ml 0.1N NaOH) compared to cola (4.8 ml 0.1N NaOH) and milk (2.02 ml 0.1N NaOH). Similarly, in the present study, orange juice in Group 1 (freshly extracted juices) and Group 2 (packed fruit juice) showed highest titratable acidity of 10.2 (ml 0.1N NaOH) and 15.6 (ml 0.1N NaOH) respectively.

Saha S et al., (2011)10 on evaluation of the acidogenic potential of commonly consumed freshly prepared fruit juices (pomegranate, lime) and commonly consumed commercially available fruit juices (guava and apple) at room temperature on pH of saliva at various time intervals, observed that all the fruit juices were acidic and reduced the salivary pH of saliva at various time intervals, with the commercially available fruit juices being more acidogenic than the fresh fruit juices. The group consuming commercially available packed fruit juices showed maximum drop in salivary pH, dropping to critical pH level (5.5+3) at 1 minute interval, followed by gradual recovery within 30 minutes of study. This greater drop was attributed to the relatively lower intrinsic pH of commercially available fruit juices.

Bamise et al., (2007)11 on determination of the erosive potential of commonly consumed soft drinks in Nigeria, which included cola drinks, non cola drinks and fruit juices, observed that cola drinks despite having the lowest pH on opening were easy to neutralize than the fruit juices and non cola drinks. Banan LK et al., (2005)1 on evaluation of plaque and salivary pH changes following consumption of fresh fruit juices (grapes, orange and pine apple) observed that the fruit juices demonstrated a low pH ranging between 2.97- 4.11, and brought about a maximum percentage reduction in plaque and salivary pH within 5 minutes of consumption. Birkhed DC et al., (1984)12 observed that fruit juices had the highest titratable acidity, approximately 2-3 times higher than the carbonated beverages and sports drinks. In the present study, it was observed that all the test beverages demonstrated erosive potential. It was further observed that the inherent pH of the fruit beverages gave no indication of the underlying titratable acidity and therefore, the erosive potential of the drink. Generally the more the titration required, the higher the buffering capacity, with a corresponding increase of erosion potential on dental enamel.

Conclusion

All the fruit beverages in the present study exhibited an erosive potential. Due to the potential detrimental effect of fruit-based beverages on the teeth, especially of very young children, the emphasis should be on increasing the public awareness of the modern society, mainly the parents about the harmful effects of these beverages. The importance of consumption of whole fruits rather than fruit juices should be accentuated.

Conflict of Interest

None. 

Supporting File
No Pictures
References
  1. Banan LK, Hegde AM. Plaque and salivary pH changes after consumption of fresh fruit juices. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;30(1):9-13.
  2. . Jihanson AK, Johanson A, Birkhed D, Omar R, Baghdais S, Carlson GE. Dental erosion, soft drink intake and oral health in young Saudi men, and the development of a system for assessing erosive tooth wear. Acta Odont Scand 1996;54(6):369-378.
  3. Imfeld T. Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Euro J Oral Sci 1996;104(2):151-155.
  4. Zero DT. Etiology of dental erosion - extrinsic factors. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104(2):162-177.
  5. Scheutzel P. Etiology of dental erosion, intrinsic factors. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104(2):178-190.
  6. Grenby TH, Mistry M, Desai T. Potential dental effects on infant’s fruit drinks studies in vitro. Br J Nutr 1990;64(6):273-283.
  7. Shelke S, Masih S, Singh N, Thomas A. The impact of modified fruit juice on enamel microhardness: An in-vitro analysis. Int J Dent Health Sci 2015;2(2):301-308.
  8. Jensdottir T, Bardow A, Holbrook P. Properties and modification of soft drinks in relation to their erosive potential in vitro. J Dent 2005;33(7):569-575.
  9. Saeed S, Al-Tinawi M. Evaluation of acidity and total sugar content of children’s popular beverages and their effect on plaque pH. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2010;28(3):189-192.
  10. Saha S, Jagannath GV, Shivkumar S, Pal SK. Effect of commonly consumed fresh fruit juices and commercially available fruit juices on pH of saliva at various time intervals. Int J Dent Med Res 2011;4(1):7-11.
  11. Bamise CT, Ogunbodede EO, Olusile AO, Esan TA. Erosive potential of soft drinks in Nigeria. World J Med Sci 2007;2(2):115-119.
  12. Birkhed DC. Sugar content, acidity and effect on plaque pH of fruit juices, fruit drinks, carbonated beverages and sport drinks. Caries Res 1984;18(3):120-127.  
HealthMinds Logo
RGUHS Logo

© 2024 HealthMinds Consulting Pvt. Ltd. This copyright specifically applies to the website design, unless otherwise stated.

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.