Article
Cover
RJDS Journal Cover Page

RGUHS Nat. J. Pub. Heal. Sci Vol No: 16 Issue No: 3   pISSN: 

Article Submission Guidelines

Dear Authors,
We invite you to watch this comprehensive video guide on the process of submitting your article online. This video will provide you with step-by-step instructions to ensure a smooth and successful submission.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Original Article

Dr. Anupama Masapu1 , Dr. S S Manikanta Kumar T2 , Dr. Ashok K P3 , Dr. Gummadi Anusha4 , Dr. Jyothi Sangineedy5 , Dr. Sahana Ashok

1,2,4: Reader, Department of Periodontics, GSL Dental College. 3: Prof. & Hod, Department of Periodontics, GSL Dental College. 5: Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, GSL Dental College. 6: Reader, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, GSL Dental College.

Address for correspondence:

Dr. Ashok KP

Prof. & Hod, Department of Periodontics, GSL Dental College. Mob-7049754198 Email : drashokkp@gmail.com

Year: 2019, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Page no. 17-21, DOI: 10.26715/rjds.11_2_4
Views: 2599, Downloads: 58
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the most widely prescribed antiseptic mouthwash in Dentistry. It is used as an adjunct with mechanical plaque control to improve its efficacy. But various interactions between CHX and dentifrices have been reported, causing confusion on the mode of usage of CHX. This study was done to try out the new modality of usage of CHX, that is immediately after tooth brushing rather than its delayed use.

<p>Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the most widely prescribed antiseptic mouthwash in Dentistry. It is used as an adjunct with mechanical plaque control to improve its efficacy. But various interactions between CHX and dentifrices have been reported, causing confusion on the mode of usage of CHX. This study was done to try out the new modality of usage of CHX, that is immediately after tooth brushing rather than its delayed use.</p>
Keywords
A pilot study
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

INTRODUCTION

Various chemotherapeutic agents have been used as adjuncts to the mechanical control of plaque, and among them, chlorhexidine (CHX) has earned its eponym of the gold standard.1 It has been widely used as an antiseptic agent for skin and mucous membrane disinfection. In dentistry, chlorhexidine is used in various forms, such as mouth rinses, oral irrigations, and slow-release devices. Chlorhexidine molecule is a cationic compound composed of two symmetrical structures with four chlorophenyl rings and two biguanide groups linked by a central hexamethylene bridge. CHX binds non-specifically to negatively-charged membrane phospholipids of bacteria. At low concentrations, CHX affects the change in the osmotic balance of the bacteria cell which leads to the release of potassium, phosphorus, and other low weight molecules.2

CHX is known for its substantivity lasting for 8-12 hours after a single rinse3 , but it also has a propensity to react with anionic surfactants and other anionic compounds, thereby affecting its activity.4,5 Most of the Toothpastes contains anions like fluorides and sodium lauryl sulfate, which interacts with chlorhexidine and form salts of low solubility.6–8 Combinations of chlorhexidine and Monofluorophosphate (MFP)have been shown to provide reduced amounts of both ions.6 Considering these interactions with the components of dentifrices, appropriate interval between toothbrushing and rinsing with CHX is proposed to be more than 30 minutes, cautiously close to 2 hours after brushing.5 Although many in-vitro studies have been conducted evaluating these interactions, the effects on clinical parameters have been poorly studied. The purpose of the present study was to compare the antiplaque efficacy of chlorhexidine mouth wash immediately and 30 minutes after brushing with fluoride toothpaste.

Materials and methods:

Periodontally healthy subjectswith in the age group of 18-50 years and with a complete set of dentition,who came to the department of periodontics, GSL dental college were selected. Subjects with systemic diseases, Patients taking any medication, especially antibiotics, patients having orthodontic appliances or prostheses, were excluded from the study. Forty subjects were selected and randomized into test and control group.

Following a clinical examination,Oral hygiene index (OHI), and Gingival index (GI) were recorded. Plaque index (PI) was recorded by using disclosing solution (GC Tri Plaque ID Gel™, USA)whichwas gently applied with a swab, micro brush, or cotton pellet. Both groups received thorough dental prophylaxis at the beginning of the test period.

The control group (n=20) was advised to use CHX mouth wash 30 min after brushing with fluoridated toothpaste (Colgate® caries protection, Colgate-Palmolive Co), and the test group (n=20)was advised to use CHX mouth wash immediately after brushing with fluoridated toothpaste. All the participants were provided with the same dentifrice, mouthwash, and toothbrush (Colgate® Slim soft toothbrush, Colgate-Palmolive Co). Both groups were instructed to use 10 ml, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (Hexidine® ICPA) for 60 sec. Patients were asked not to brush teeth, or not to eat and drink immediately after using Chlorhexidine gluconate oral rinse.

Plaque index (PI), Oral hygiene index (OHI), and Gingival index (GI) were again recordedat the end of 14 days for both the groups.

Results

Intra-group comparisons were made to assess the difference of Plaque index, gingival index, OHI-S at baseline, and 14 days in both test and control groups using the paired t-test. Intergroup comparison was made with an independent sample t-test to assess the difference in the Plaque index, gingival index, OHI-S.

Statistically significant differences were observed in all the parameters in Intra-group comparisons but not in Inter-group comparison

Discussion

CHX is recognized as the standard criterion drug for plaque and gingivitis control in periodontitis.9 At the end of a single rinse with CHX mouthwash, around 33% of the active ingredient remains on the oral mucosa.3 Using 0.12-0.2% concentrations of CHX in mouthwashes results in a significant reduction of gingival inflammation and plaque indexes.10 Several studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analysis have confirmed the efficacy of Chlorhexidine on inhibition of plaque accumulation and gingivitis.11–14 The present study is also in tandem with these studies and showed a statistically significant reduction in PI, GI, and OHI scores both in control as well as test groups.

Even though CHX is a very effective antiseptic agent, its efficacy is thought to reduce due to its interaction with various ingredients of dentifrices. Some studies postulate that the efficiency of CHX could be inhibited by certain anionic surfactants, particularly sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and the monofluoride phosphate present in commercial toothpaste, supposedly due to the multiple chemical reactions between these compounds. Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is the most commonly used surfactant to enhance the foaming action of a dentifrice. SLS has been reported to interfere with the antiplaque potential of CHX through the formation of low-solubility salts.15 Other studies suggested that an SLS-based mouthwash can deactivate CHX for up to 30 minutes after its use.5,7,16 Fluoride is another agent used in dentifrices for its anti-caries action. Ionic reactions between fluoride and chlorhexidine may result in a decreased concentration of chlorhexidine.17 It is thought that the first two compounds (being negatively charged) bind with CHX, thereby reducing its activity, and these ingredients may also compete for the binding sites of CHX, thus causing an accelerated clearance of the molecule from oral tissues.16Hence, it was proposed that time (at least 30 minutes) should elapse between brushing performed at home and the use of CHX mouthwash.

More recent randomized clinical trials, however, have shown that the anti-plaque activity of CHX is not altered by using chlorhexidine rinse before or after brushing with a toothpaste containing SLS.18,19 The most recent findings, therefore, do not suggest a reduced efficacy of CHX when used as a mouthwash in combination with a commercial toothpaste as part of a regular oral hygiene routine. On the contrary, brushing (with or without toothpaste) is essential to breaking up and removing the oral biofilm, exposing the bacteria to the antibacterial agent, and making the tooth surface more favourable to CHX adhesion. Plaque removal before rinsing leads to increased efficacy of CHX mouthwash and a reduction in its local adverse effects.20 This uncertainty has raised speculations and has created a topic for debate.

In the present study, the dentifrice used consists of Sodium monofluorophosphate 0.76% (0.15% w/v fluoride ion) and the surfactant sodium lauryl sulfate 1–5 % (Colgate® caries protection, Colgate-Palmolive Co.).

In the present study, no statistically significant difference was observed in PI, GI, OHI-S in patients who are using mouth wash immediately and 30 min after tooth brushing, suggesting there is no decrease in efficiency of chlorhexidine clinically. This is in tandem with recent studies. The Limitation of this study includes the possibility of Hawthorne Effect. Further studies are required with microbial analysis, and more sample size and varying concentrations of chlorhexidine to validate the findings.

Conclusion

Literature relating to this interaction is limited; more controlled microbiologic and clinical studies are needed to certify the accuracy of this modality of administration. As per the present study, CHX mouthwash may be recommended in combination with a dentifrice without any interference.

Supporting File
References
  1. Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 20001997; 15:55–62.
  2. KarpiƄski TM, Szkaradkiewicz AK. Chlorhexidine–pharmaco-biological activity and application. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:1321–6.
  3. Bonesvoll P. Oral pharmacology of chlorhexidine. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:49– 65.
  4. Addy M. Chlorhexidine compared with other locally delivered antimicrobials. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:957–64.
  5. Kolahi J, Soolari A. Rinsing with chlorhexidine gluconate solution after brushing and flossing teeth: a systematic review of effectiveness. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 19852006;37:605–12.
  6. BARKVOLL P, RÖLLA G, BELLAGAMBA S. Interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium monofluorophosphate in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 1988;96:30–33.
  7. BarkvollP al, Rølla G, Svendsen AK. Interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium lauryl sulfate in vivo. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:593–595.
  8. Kirkegaard E, Von der Fehr F, Rölla G. Influence of chlorhexidine on in vitro uptake of fluoride in dental enamel. Eur J Oral Sci1974;82:566–569.
  9. da Costa LFNP, Amaral C da SF, Barbirato D da S, Leão ATT, Fogacci MF. Chlorhexidine mouthwash as an adjunct to mechanical therapy in chronic periodontitis. J Am Dent Assoc 2017;148:308–18.
  10. Berchier CE, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. The efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse compared with 0.2% on plaque accumulation and periodontal parameters: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:829–39.
  11. Lorenz K, Bruhn G, Heumann C, Netuschil L, Brecx M, Hoffmann T. Effect of two new chlorhexidine mouthrinses on the development of dental plaque, gingivitis, and discolouration. A randomized, investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-week experimental gingivitis study. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:561–7.
  12. Jayaprakash K, Veeresha KL, Hiremath SS. A comparative study of two mouthrinses on plaque and gingivitis in school children in the age group of 13-16 years in Bangalore city. J Indian Soc PedodPrev Dent 2007;25:126–9.
  13. Van Strydonck DAC, Slot DE, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden F. Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque, gingival inflammation and staining in gingivitis patients: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:1042–55.
  14. Herrera D. Chlorhexidine mouthwash reduces plaque and gingivitis. Evid Based Dent 2013;14:17–8.
  15. Elkerbout T, Slot D, Bakker E, Van der Weijden G. Chlorhexidine mouthwash and sodium lauryl sulphate dentifrice: do they mix effectively or interfere? Int J Dent Hyg2 016;14:42–52.
  16. Owens J, Addy M, Faulkner J, Lockwood C, Adair R. A short-term clinical study design to investigate the chemical plaque inhibitory properties of mouthrinses when used as adjuncts to toothpastes: applied to chlorhexidine. J ClinPeriodontol 1997;24:732–7.
  17. Freitas CS de, Diniz HFO, Gomes JB, Sinisterra RD, Cortés ME. Evaluation of the substantivity of chlorhexidine in association with sodium fluoride in vitro. PesquiOdontológica Bras 2003;17:78–81.
  18. Van Strydonck D a. C, Timmerman MF, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Plaque inhibition of two commercially available chlorhexidine mouthrinses. J ClinPeriodontol 2005;32:305–9.
  19. Van Strydonck D a. C, Timmerman MF, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden GA. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse in combination with an SLS-containing dentifrice and a dentifrice slurry. J ClinPeriodontol 2006;33:340–4.
  20. Zanatta FB, Antoniazzi RP, Rösing CK. Staining and calculus formation after 0.12% chlorhexidine rinses in plaque-free and plaque covered surfaces: a randomized trial. J Appl Oral Sci Rev FOB 2010;18:515– 21.  
HealthMinds Logo
RGUHS Logo

© 2024 HealthMinds Consulting Pvt. Ltd. This copyright specifically applies to the website design, unless otherwise stated.

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.