RGUHS Nat. J. Pub. Heal. Sci Vol No: 16 Issue No: 4 pISSN:
Dear Authors,
We invite you to watch this comprehensive video guide on the process of submitting your article online. This video will provide you with step-by-step instructions to ensure a smooth and successful submission.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.
1Dr. Kharidhi Laxman Vandana, Former Senior Professor, Department of Periodontics, Former Associate Dean Academics, NAAC Editor, CODSJOD, College of Dental Sciences, Davanagere, Karnataka, India.
2Private Practitioner, Consultant Periodontist and Implantologist, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3Private Practitioner, Consultant Periodontist and Implantologist, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
*Corresponding Author:
Dr. Kharidhi Laxman Vandana, Former Senior Professor, Department of Periodontics, Former Associate Dean Academics, NAAC Editor, CODSJOD, College of Dental Sciences, Davanagere, Karnataka, India., Email: vanrajs@gmail.comAbstract
The frenum is a fold of mucous membrane connecting the lips and cheeks to the gingiva, periosteum, and alveolar mucosa. It often contains muscle fibers. The maxillary labial frenum, mandibular labial frenum, and lingual frenum are the three most often seen frenum that are typically present in the oral cavity. Their main function is to stabilize the tongue, upper lip, and lower lip. The mucogingival junction and alveolar mucosa involved in the frenum are said to be structurally identical to those in any other area. The limited information on frenum per se and its clinical implications has not been adequately dealt with in the literature. Hence, an attempt was made to present them in this review.
Keywords
Downloads
-
1FullTextPDF
Article
Introduction
Labial frenum is a dynamic and often changeable structure and is subject to variation in shape, size and position during the different stages of growth and development.1 During growth, it tends to decrease in size and lose clinical importance.2 In young children, the frenum is generally wide and thick, and during growth, it becomes thin and small.3 In its composition, it consists of epithelium, collagen fibers, nerve fibers and capillaries, and sometimes few elements of minor salivary glands and isolated stratified muscle fibers. It has a wide and relatively deep origin or base on the inferior surface of the upper lip. It extends to the middle portion of the labial surface of the alveolar process between the maxillary central incisors and here it is attached to the periosteum, the maxillary suture’s connective tissue, and the alveolar process.4
Normal vertical development of the alveolar process often accomplishes the displacement of the attachment in an apical direction. The prolonged midline diastema has been linked to a major causal component, namely the inability of the connected frenal fibers to move apically, leaving a residual strip of tissue between the maxillary central incisors. In addition to preventing the space closure between the upper central incisors, it can lead to food impaction. The oral hygiene gets poor due to compromised brushing, resulting in inflammatory destruction of periodontium.5
Currently, there is no comprehensive review of the frenum, a tiny fold that plays an important role silently. When its location or morphology is abnormal, it attracts interdisciplinary attention in dentistry. This study represents the first attempt to provide a thorough review of the labial frenum. The review of frenum is covered under the following aspects.
Development of Frenum
The maxillary labial frenum is a fold of tissue that extends into the vestibule and midportion of the upper lip from the maxillary midline region of the gingiva. It is typically triangular in form.5 The superior labial frenum appears to be developed from the frontonasal process.6
Within the first few months of fetal life, it emerges as a part of oral cavity, along with lips and cheeks.7 The tuberculum is a protrusion that develops into the central portion of the inner zone of upper lip as growth and development proceeds. This is also the period when the palatine papilla, another protrusion on the anterior portion of the palate, originates.
The tuberculum and the palatine papilla are connected by a continuous tissue fold known as the ‘tectolabial frenum’. By continuing as a continuous band of tissue from the inner side of the upper lip to the palatine papilla, and across the alveolar ridge in the process, the tectolabial frenum in fetuses resemble the aberrant frenum of postnatal life. The continuous tissue fold is normally severed by the expanding alveolar process, separating it into the palatal and labial halves. The attachment of superior labial frenum is from the lip to alveolar crestal ridge, consisting of labial tissue on the labial side which is equivalent to palatine papilla on the palatal side.8
Variation in Size of Frenum
Usually broad in origin, it exhibits a smooth septum that becomes narrower as it advances posteriorly, inserting at the outer aspect of periosteum, intermaxillary suture and midline connective tissue of the alveolar process. The frenum is like any other structure. It has a range of normality in that it varies in bulk from a thick mass to a thin fold of tissue, and in attachment height from near the alveolar crest to apical aspect. These frena differ in terms of tissue mass in addition to attachment and height.1
Histology of Frenum
In 1935, Noyes et al. conducted a histological study on newborn infants and discovered that the frenum is primarily made up of connective tissue.7 A small number of striated muscle fibers which originate from the lip muscle bundles on either side of the midline, pass medially and posteriorly in a diagonal direction without reaching the alveolar process. The loose character of the fibrous connective tissue becomes more regular in arrangement with strands lying in an anteroposterior direction as it nears the alveolar attachment. In the labial section, mucus glands are located on each side of central artery and vein close to the lip muscle bundles. The frenum receives branches from this artery and vein that flow anteroposteriorly, supplying the structure's blood supply. The posterior fibers terminate by ramifying with the alveolar crestal connective tissue and its anterior surface (Table 1).
There is dispute on the histologic morphology of the frenum in terms of whether or not muscle tissue is present.
Tension test
By exerting stress on frenum, the papillary tip movement or blanching effect caused by local ischemia is noted. The aberrant or abnormal frenum can be visually identified. A positive tension test represents abnormal frenum and a negative test represents one frenum.13
Frenum as Etiologic Factor
The anatomical presence of labial and buccal frenum are extremely important in maintaining the cheeks and lips in place by its tiny fold of mucosa containing muscle fibers or elastic fibers, collagen fibers is controversial.
• The abnormality of frenum is recognized in its attachment to gingiva and its size. The different attachments beyond the normal mucosal attachment can affect the health of mucogingival junction by its pull effect during muscular movements, resulting in plaque accumulation indirectly leading to gingivitis, localized periodontitis, and in cases where gingiva thickness is less than 1 mm, could result in gingival recession. The effect of pull syndrome is only realized on clinical presentation of above changes.
• Conversely, diastema is caused by the unsightly, thick, abnormally large frenum in the front part of maxillary arch, which is frequently subjected to mechanical damage when brushing. Some writers claim that labial frenum in the maxilla is the intervening factor responsible for midline diastema closure. Studies on children with primary, mixed, or permanent dentitions, however, have not shown a connection between the various forms of frenum and the formation of midline diastema.14
• The labial frenum in maxilla or its accompanying interdental soft tissue are often cited as the causative factors for recurrence of approximated teeth in prior diastema areas. In addition to functional and aesthetic compromise, as an anatomical entity, frenum is crucial in the expression of different symptoms such as diastema or recession of gingiva.
Classification of Frenum
The analysis of literature indicates that the maxillary labial frenum exhibits various morphologies, each with distinct clinical significance (Tables 2 and 3).
Modified Classification
Frenum per se is not responsible for the presentation of signs, such as spacing between teeth and gingival recession. Its adjacent mucosal relations contribute to the frenum induced consequences. Hence the use of term ‘high frenum’ should be avoided which usually refers to those frenum close to gingival margin producing the consequences such as diastema and gingival recession. The use of terms such as ‘abnormal’ or ‘normal’ is recommended based on its location, size and functional ability, that is presence of positive tension test or pull syndrome or not. On visual examination, frenum can be designated as thin or thick without any dimensional measurements (Table 4).
Association of Frenal Attachments with Various Syndromes (Table 5a)
• Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
• Ellis-van Creveld syndrome
• Holoprosencephaly
• Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis
• Oro-facial-digital syndrome
Abnormal Frenum in Mixed Dentition from Orthodontic and Pedodontic Perspective: Diastema and Timing of Frenum Excision
Most tests state that an abnormally large and marginally positioned labial frenum would result in persistent maxillary midline diastema. Moreover, there appears to be consensus in the pedodontic and orthodontic literature that, given that most diastemas close on their own when all the anterior teeth erupt, there is little reason to remove any part of an "abnormal" labial frenum, before the eruption of maxillary lateral incisors and canines.
• Taylor described the presence of diastema in maxilla as normal with a 98 percent prevalence among 6-7 year old children, while only 7 percent of 12 to 18 years old retained these diastemas.25
• Dewel has shown that in diastema conditions, early ("preventive") frenectomies without previous orthodontic closure may cause scar development, which may in turn tend to prevent normal mesial migration of the incisors.
• Archer illustrated the traditional frenectomy procedure which involved excision of the whole frenum, the palatine papilla and the interdental papilla, exposing the bone and/or periosteum.10
• While there is little evidence that a frenectomy performed before orthodontic closure speeds up tooth movement, orthodontists have long opposed early frenectomy, arguing that even without this, the tissue configuration after the diastema closure would be less predictable and the rate at which a frenum can close is still relatively quick. This is in contrast to the opinions of many oral surgeons.
• However, during frenectomy, it is recommended to remove the periosteum beneath the excised portion of the frenum to eliminate the elastic fibers of the frenum that have been known to pierce the periosteum in order to reduce the recurrence of orthodontically closed diastemas. Such elastic fibers have not been demonstrated to adversely affect the increase in attached gingiva following a frenotomy, nor have they been shown to adversely affect the alleviation of relapse in diastema cases.
• Nevertheless, since there is no evidence of elastic tissue involvement with attached gingiva anywhere in the normal human periodontium, it appears crucial to remove the elastic fibers impregnating the periosteum beneath the frenum, if the goal of the surgical procedure is to remove the unwanted frenal tissue and establish a normal interdental soft-tissue anatomy.
• There was a considerable, though not total, association between a midline diastema and a clinically "abnormal" appearing maxillary midline frenum prior to treatment. A certain proportion of individuals had either no diastema at all or no diastema at all but an “abnormal” frenum.
Conclusion
The frenum is an unremarkable structure when normal; however, abnormalities draw significant attention and often necessitate excision. It holds importance in various dental specialties, including periodontics, orthodontics, conservative dentistry and prosthodontics.
Conflicts of Interest
Nil
Supporting File
References
1. Ceremello PJ. The superior labial frenum and the midline diastema and their relation to growth and development of the oral structures. Am J Orthod 1953;39(2):120‑39.
2. Dewel BF. The labial frenum, midline diastema, and palatine papilla: A clinical analysis. Dent Clin North Am 1966;10:177-84.
3. Noyes HJ. The anatomy of the frenum labia in newborn infants. Angle Orthod 1935;1:3‑8.
4. Díaz-Pizán ME, Lagravère MO, Villena R. Midline diastema and frenum morphology in the primary dentition. J Dent Child (Chic) 2006;73:11-4.
5. Friedman L, Levine HL. Mucogingival surgery: Current status. J Periodontol 1964;35:5-21.
6. Boyd JD. The Classification of the upper lip in mammals. J Anat 1933;67:409-16.
7. Noyes, Frederick B, Schor I, et al. Dental Histology and Embryology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1938. p. 42-43.
8. Orban B. Oral Histology and Embryology. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Company; 1949. p. 23-27.
9. Knox LR, Young HC. Histological studies of the labial frenum. IADR program and abstracts. 1962;80:303-4.
10. Archer WH, editor. Oral Surgery-A step by step atlas of operative techniques. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1961. p. 192.
11. Dewel BF. The normal and the abnormal labial frenum: clinical differentiation. J Am Dent Assoc 1946;33:318-29.
12. Henry SW, Levin MP, Tsaknis PJ. Histologic features of the superior labial frenum. J Periodontol 1976;47:25-8.
13. Priyanka M, Sruthi R, Ramakrishnan T, et al. An overview of frenal attachments. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:12-5.
14. Kaimenyi JT. Occurrence of midline diastema and frenum attachments amongst school children in Nairobi, Kenya. Indian J Dent Res 1998;9:67-71.
15. Sewerin I. Prevalence of variations and anomalies of the upper labial frenum. Acta Odontol Scand 1971;29:487-96.
16. Mirko P, Miroslav S, Lubor M. Significance of the labial frenum attachment in periodontal disease in man. Part I. Classification and epidemiology of the labial frenum attachment. J Periodontol 1974;45:891-4.
17. Dodge JA, Kernohan DC. Oral-facial-digital syndrome. Arch Dis Child 1967;42:214-9.
18. Jenista JA. Mandibular frenulum as a sign of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr 2001;138:447.
19. Martin RA, Jones KL. Absence of the superior labial frenulum in holoprosencephaly: A new diagnostic sign. J Pediatr 1998;133:151-3.
20. Babaji P. Oral abnormalities in the Ellis-van Creveld syndrome. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21: 143-5.
21. Mintz SM, Siegel MA, Seider PJ. An overview of oral frena and their association with multiple syndromic and nonsyndromic conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:321-4.
22. Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery: a review of 655 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1128-36.
23. Stoner JE, Mazdyasna S. Gingival recession in the lower incisor region of 15-year-old subjects. J Periodontol 1980;51:74-6.
24. Dodwad V. Aetiology and severity of gingival recession among young individuals in Belgaum district in India. Annals of Dentistry University of Malaya 2001;8:1-6.
25. Taylor JE. Clinical observations relating to the normal and abnormal frenum labii superioris. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1939;25:646-50.
26. Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. Philadelphia: SS White Dental Mfg. Co.;1907. p. 569.33.
27. Dewey M. Practical Orthodontia. St. Louis: C. V. Mosbv Company; 1921. p. 136- 137.
28. Strang RHW. Textbook of Orthodontia. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1950. p. 150, 246.
29. Lindsey D. The upper mid-line space and its relation to the labial fraenum in children and in adults. A statistical evaluation. Br Dent J 1977;143:327-32.
30. Dedwel BF. The normal and the abnormal labial frenum; clinical differentiation. J Am Dent Assoc 1946;33:318-29.
31. Pushpavathi N, Nayak RP. The effect of mouth breathing, upper lip coverage, lip seal and frenal attachment on the gingiva of 11-14 year old Indian school children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1997;15:100-3.
32. Addy M, Dummer PM, Hunter ML, et al. A study of the association of fraenal attachment, lip coverage, and vestibular depth with plaque and gingivitis. J Periodontol 1987;58:752-7.
33. Mintz SM, Siegel MA, Seider PJ. An overview of oral frena and their association with multiple syndromic and nonsyndromic conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:321-4.
34. Biber JT. Oral piercing: the hole story. Northwest Dent 2003;82:13-7.
35. Maguire S, Hunter B, Hunter L, et al. Welsh Child Protection Systematic Review Group.Diagnosing abuse: A systematic review of torn frenum and other intra-oral injuries. Arch Dis Child 2007;92:1113-7.