Article
Case Report
Meghashyama Kulkarni*,1, Sahana N S2, Chandrakala J3, Renuga S4, Hajira Khatoon5, Rhea Verghese6,

1Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bengaluru- 560002, India.

2Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

3Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

4Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

5Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

6Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

*Corresponding Author:

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bengaluru- 560002, India., Email: meghashyamakulkarni@gmail.com
Received Date: 2022-08-19,
Accepted Date: 2022-10-02,
Published Date: 2022-12-31
Year: 2022, Volume: 14, Issue: 4, Page no. 135-138, DOI: 10.26463/rjds.14_4_1
Views: 639, Downloads: 17
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Central odontogenic fibroma is a rare, mesenchymal, odontogenic neoplasm with a prevalence of 0.1% of all odontogenic tumors. Herein, we present a case of a 63-year-old female with swelling in the left posterior maxillary region which was later diagnosed as a central type of odontogenic fibroma. A painless swelling was noted in the left maxillary tuberosity area. Orthopantamogram was advised which revealed a unilocular lesion with a mixed radiopaque/radiolucent appearance. This was associated with a spherically dense radiopaque mass in the left maxillary sinus region. A provisional diagnosis of the calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor was made. An incisional biopsy was done and the specimen was sent for histopathological evaluation. The microscopic examination revealed inactive-looking odontogenic islands in the background of mature connective tissue stroma. Few foci of calcifications were also noted. After contemplating all the histological features, a final diagnosis of central odontogenic fibroma was given. This case emphasizes the importance of histopathological examination of the unusual and rarely observed central odontogenic fibroma, which can be missed due to similarities with other entities. 

<p>Central odontogenic fibroma is a rare, mesenchymal, odontogenic neoplasm with a prevalence of 0.1% of all odontogenic tumors. Herein, we present a case of a 63-year-old female with swelling in the left posterior maxillary region which was later diagnosed as a central type of odontogenic fibroma. A painless swelling was noted in the left maxillary tuberosity area. Orthopantamogram was advised which revealed a unilocular lesion with a mixed radiopaque/radiolucent appearance. This was associated with a spherically dense radiopaque mass in the left maxillary sinus region. A provisional diagnosis of the calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor was made. An incisional biopsy was done and the specimen was sent for histopathological evaluation. The microscopic examination revealed inactive-looking odontogenic islands in the background of mature connective tissue stroma. Few foci of calcifications were also noted. After contemplating all the histological features, a final diagnosis of central odontogenic fibroma was given. This case emphasizes the importance of histopathological examination of the unusual and rarely observed central odontogenic fibroma, which can be missed due to similarities with other entities.&nbsp;</p>
Keywords
Calcification, Inactive islands, Odontogenic fibroma, Odontogenic tumors
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article
Introduction

Central odontogenic fibroma (COF) is a rare, benign, mesenchymal odontogenic tumor comprising 0.1% of all odontogenic neoplasms. World Health Organization (WHO) defines COF as a neoplasm made of mature fibrous connective tissue with variable amounts of inactive-looking odontogenic epithelium, with or without the evidence of calcification.1 The 3rd edition of the WHO classification of odontogenic tumors in the year 2005 divided COF into two histological types: the simple odontogenic fibroma (epithelium poor) and the complex odontogenic fibroma, more commonly known as the WHO type (epithelium rich).2 However, in the 2017 WHO classification (4th edition), the subtypes were excluded due to poorly defined and documented epithelial poor type of COF.

COFs pose a diagnostic dilemma to clinicians as well as pathologists. The clinical and radiological features of this tumor are not distinct. It has a close resemblance with other odontogenic and/or non-odontogenic tumors and cannot be distinguished either clinically or radiographically. The differential diagnosis is based on the histopathological examination which is quite challenging due to the rarity of this entity.

In this case report, we narrate a case of a 63-year-old female patient with swelling in the left maxilla which was later diagnosed as a central odontogenic fibroma. 

Case Description

A 63-year-old female, with no significant medical history, reported the complaint of missing teeth in her upper and lower arches and wanted to get her teeth replaced. However, on clinical examination, a diffuse swelling was evident on the left side of the upper jaw in the maxillary tuberosity region. Buccal and palatal cortical plate expansion was seen in the left maxillary alveolar ridge extending from the 26 to 28 region (Figure 1). On palpation, the swelling was bony and hard in consistency with a smooth surface. Surprisingly, the patient was unaware of the swelling and had no pain or discomfort in that region. Orthopantomogram (OPG) was advised which revealed the presence of a spherically dense radiopaque mass (supposedly impacted tooth number 28) in the left maxillary sinus region measuring approximately 1.5x1.5cm. This dense mass at its distal aspect was associated with an expansile unilocular lesion with a corticated border measuring approximately 3.0x3.0cm. The lesion had a mixed radiopaque/radiolucent appearance (Figure 2). Radiographic differential diagnosis revealed calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CEOT) and dentigerous cyst. 

An incisional biopsy was performed under local anesthesia. On macroscopic examination, 12 soft tissue bits of the specimen were received which were whitish with the largest tissue bit measuring about 1.2×0.4×0.2cm (Figure 3).

The microscopic examination of the Hematoxylin and Eosin stained section revealed mature, cellular connective tissue stroma with few inactive-looking odontogenic islands in the form of nests and strands (Figure 4A). The odontogenic epithelial cells were cuboidal and ovoid with hyperchromatic nuclei (Figure 4B). A few focal areas of eosinophilic calcifications were also noted (Figure 4C). Due to the lack of intercellular bridges between the odontogenic epithelial cells, basophilic liesegang calcifications, and amyloid deposition in the connective tissue, CEOT was ruled out. Despite the ambiguous clinical and radiographic pictures, thorough histopathological evaluation helped to arrive at the diagnosis of COF. The patient was not willing to undergo further treatment, hence the final definitive diagnosis will, unfortunately, remain a mystery for the excisional biopsy findings that could have revealed a different picture. The rehabilitation was done with the construction of a denture, the patient is on regular follow-ups for foreseeing any changes in the tumor growth.

Discussion

Odontogenic fibroma (OF) is topographically categorized into two types: the central or intraosseous type and the peripheral or extraosseous type. 3

The peripheral odontogenic fibroma usually occurs in the mandibular gingiva and is more commonly encountered than the central type.4 Of all the odontogenic tumors, central odontogenic fibroma has the most poorly defined parameters. There is a lack of unanimity regarding the nature of this lesion due to the rarity of the cases.5

COF can appear at any age with a mean age of 40 years and have a slight predilection for females. COFs occur equally in the maxilla and the mandible. The most common locations are the anterior maxillary regions (71%) and posterior mandibular regions (73%).6 Radiographically, the lesions present as unilocular/ multilocular radiolucencies with well-defined borders sometimes associated with an impacted tooth. A mixed radiolucent and radiopaque lesion is found in 10.7% of the cases in the mandible.7 In the present described case, we encountered a unilocular lesion with sparse calcifications, rendering it a mixed radiolucent and radiopaque appearance.

In 1980, Gardner classified COF histologically into three different groups:

1) Hyperplastic dental follicle

2) Simple COF comprising of fibrous type of connective tissue with nests of odontogenic epithelium

3) The WHO-type COF with features of dysplastic dentin or cementum-like tissue and varying amounts of odontogenic epithelium

However, Gardner emphasized that hyperplastic dental follicles cannot be considered COF. The WHO type of COF was described by Doyle et al. as a complex odontogenic fibroma to which Gardener concurred.8

However, the 4th edition of the WHO classification of odontogenic tumors (2017) eliminated the terms ‘simple’ and ‘complex’ and suggested the usage of the term central odontogenic fibroma, unanimously.1 Hence, in the present case, a diagnosis of ‘central odontogenic fibroma’ was given.

Histologically, differential diagnosis of COF includes ameloblastic fibroma (AF), desmoplastic fibroma (DF), hyperplastic dental follicle, and odontogenic myxoma. Desmoplastic fibroma has a very aggressive behavior and is devoid of epithelial islands and has myofibroblasts in the connective tissue.9 Ameloblastic fibroma, on the other hand, is composed of active odontogenic islands, with connective tissue being highly cellular and embryonic looking.5 COF with an unerupted tooth can be mistaken as a hyperplastic dental follicle. Nevertheless, the presence of large odontogenic islands and mature connective tissue in COF can help in differentiating it from the hyperplastic dental follicle.5 In contrary to COF, epithelial islands are rarely seen in odontogenic myxoma. The latter contains spindle-shaped, stellate cells in a loose myxoid stroma.7 One can arrive at a diagnosis of COF after the exclusion of different lesions.

COFs are treated by conservative surgery. Recurrence is rare and is seen in cases with an incomplete curettage, otherwise, the prognosis of the tumor is good.10

It is of utmost importance to emphasize the rarity of odontogenic fibroma and that it should not be missed due to its ambiguous clinical and radiographic features. As with the case presented, diligent histological evaluation along with consideration of the differential diagnosis helped to arrive at the final diagnosis.

Conflict of Interest

None

Supporting Files
References
  1. El-Naggar AK, Chan JK, Grandis JR. 4th ed. WHO classification of head and neck tumours; 2017. 
  2. Allen CM, Hammond HL, Stimson PG. Central odontogenic fibroma, WHO type: a report of three cases with an unusual associated giant cell reaction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73:62-6. 
  3. Hara M, Matsuzaki H, Katase N, Yanagi Y, Unetsubo T, Asaumi JI et al. Central odontogenic fibroma of the jawbone: 2 case reports describing its imaging features and an analysis of its DCE-MRI findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113:51-8.
  4. Puppala N, Madala JK, Mareddy AR, Dumpala RK. Central odontogenic fibroma of the mandible. ASDC J Dent Child 2016;83:94-7. 
  5. Sivapathasundharam B. Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology. 9th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. 
  6. Lin HP, Chen HM, Vu CH, Yang H, Kuo RC, Kuo YS et al. Odontogenic fibroma: a clinicopathological study of 15 cases. J. Formos. Med. Assoc 2011; 110:27-35.
  7. Oueslati Y, Belkacem Chebil R, Oualha L, Mziou Z, Moatemri R, Sriha B et al. Central odontogenic fibroma of simple type: An original observation. SAGE Open Med. Case Rep 2021; 9:20-5. 
  8. Doyle JL, Lamster IB, Baden E. Odontogenic fibroma of the complex (WHO) type: report of six cases. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg 1985; 43:666-74. 
  9. Schneider M, Zimmermann AC, Depprich RA, Kübler NR, Engers R, Naujoks CD et al. Desmoplastic fibroma of the mandible-review of the literature and presentation of a rare case. Head Face Med 2009; 5:1-5.
  10. Thankappan P, Chundru NS, Amudala R, Yanadi P, Rahamthullah SA, Botu M. Central odontogenic fibroma of simple type. Case Rep Dent 2014
We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.