Article
Case Report

Amy Elizabeth Thomas1 , Sushant Kumar Soni1 , Pramod Krishna B2 , Rajdeep Singh1 , Sushmita Batra1

1 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research Institute, Rajnandgaon, India

2 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Subbaiah Institute of Dental Sciences, Shivamogga, India

*Corresponding author:

Dr. Sushmita Batra, Bachelor Of Dental Surgery, Post Graduate Student (Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery), Chhattisgarh Dental College And Research Institute, Rajnandgaon, India. Email: sushmitabatra2095@ gmail.com

Received date: 19/01/22; Accepted date: 21/03/22; Published date: 30/09/2022

Year: 2022, Volume: 14, Issue: 3, Page no. 118-120, DOI: 10.26715/rjds.14_3_19
Views: 615, Downloads: 18
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

The oral cavity can be a site for foreign body entrapment either via accidental traumatic injury or due to an iatrogenic error. Diagnosis of the same could be a challenge, especially when the patient is unaware and asymptomatic. The present case study intended to highlight a case of a longstanding iatrogenic foreign body in the oral cavity with an intriguing radiographic presentation indicating the importance of (i) thorough history taking and clinical examination and (ii) checking for integrity of surgical instruments post usage.

<p>The oral cavity can be a site for foreign body entrapment either via accidental traumatic injury or due to an iatrogenic error. Diagnosis of the same could be a challenge, especially when the patient is unaware and asymptomatic. The present case study intended to highlight a case of a longstanding iatrogenic foreign body in the oral cavity with an intriguing radiographic presentation indicating the importance of (i) thorough history taking and clinical examination and (ii) checking for integrity of surgical instruments post usage.</p>
Keywords
Foreign body, Oral cavity, Longstanding, Radiographic presentation, Surgical instrument
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

Introduction

A wide range of materials can get entrapped into the oral cavity and thereby act as a foreign body. Foreign body entrapment may occur as a result of a traumatic event or even iatrogenically. The foreign body impaction may be diagnosed only if the patient becomes symptomatic or during a chance radiographic examination for some unrelated symptom. Many times patients are unaware as well as asymptomatic and hence such cases are not diagnosed. Plain radiographs are routinely used to aid in the diagnosis of any pathology about the jaws but being two-dimensional, it is inadequate to locate the foreign body. Thus, it could give a misleading presentation of its bony location. Cone Beam Computed Tomography can overcome this problem. In a situation of financial constraints, a thorough history and clinical examination can help in locating a foreign body. We reported a case of a longstanding iatrogenic foreign body in the oral cavity with an intriguing radiographic presentation. The study indicated the importance of taking a thorough history and clinical examination as well as checking for the integrity of surgical instruments post usage.

Case Report

A 53-year-old man was referred to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery for the removal of a foreign body from the left maxillary second molar region of the jaw. The patient had visited them for artificial tooth fabrication in the same region. Before planning of fixed prosthesis, an intraoral periapical radiograph was taken which revealed a root tip-shaped radio-opacity. This was interpreted as a broken implant component/ foreign body (Fig. 1) and thereby referred to us for retrieval.

The patient had a history of difficult extraction 10 years back in the same region. The socket wound had healed uneventfully and the patient had remained asymptomatic since then. Clinical examination of the missing tooth region revealed a well-rounded alveolar ridge and a healthy overlying mucosa (Figure 2). On palpation of the maxillary vestibule of that region, an irregularly raised ridge with step deformity was felt with no tenderness or mobility. It was in stark contrast to the same region on the contra-lateral side, the palpation of which revealed a smooth raised ridge of the zygomatic process of the maxilla. The unusual palpatory findings raised our suspicion that a foreign body might be impacted in that region, given that the patient had no history of trauma.

Under local anesthesia, following standard aseptic protocol a three-cornered flap was raised, revealing a metallic piece (Fig.3). The piece was retrieved with ease using a Molts no. 9 periosteal elevator. The retrieved metallic object seemed to be a broken tip of the beak of the root extraction forceps/ elevator (Fig. 4). The flap was re-approximated and sutured back in position. The wound healed uneventfully and the patient is planning for a fixed prosthesis.

Discussion

Studies of a foreign body impacted in the oral cavity are few owing to the patients being asymptomatic. Although, it is more commonly reported in children [1]. Foreign bodies that have been found impacted either traumatically or iatrogenically have been reported in the literature [2]. Diagnosis of the exact site of the foreign body with plain radiographs can be challenging as it gives only a two-dimensional view which is inadequate to locate any object. The inherent radiodensity of the foreign body also influences its detectability on a plain radiograph [3]. In literature, foreign body impactions have been radiographically misdiagnosed as some pathology [4]. This highlights the inadequacy of plain radiographs in diagnosing the location as well as the type of entity. Notably, in our case, the referral we got was for the removal of a foreign body from the left maxillary second molar region. The radiographic presentation was peculiar and intriguing as the foreign body had a similar shape to that of the root tip but was more radio-opaque than the usual root presentation (Fig. 1). The shape was also unusual for a radiographic presentation of an odontoma. The patient did not have any history of implant placement as well. A thorough clinical examination helped in diagnosing the site of the foreign body, facilitating its retrieval with ease, and hence its importance shouldn’t be overlooked. Cone Beam Computed Tomography is an excellent diagnostic tool for identifying the location of the metallic foreign body [4,5]. Financial restraints and the socioeconomic background of patients precludes its use [4].

Defective instruments when used in exodontia may lead to its breakage which rarely goes unidentified [5]. However, in our case, the patient was unaware as well as asymptomatic and the instrument tip was retrieved a decade later. In a similar case report, a dental elevator tip was retrieved from the mandibular third molar socket area which was found to be covered with a layer of granulation tissue [5]. But in our case, no such observation was reported. Moreover in our case, the instrument tip was laying just below the mucosa over the buccal bone.

The importance of a thorough clinical examination cannot be overemphasized in identifying the probable location of a foreign body lying superficially. As a plain radiograph is rendered inadequate, Cone Beam Computed Tomogram is recommended for accurate location of foreign body in the oral cavity. Care should be taken by the dentist to inspect the instruments post-operatively to avoid missing instrument breakage in situ.

Conflict of Interest

None

Supporting Files
References

1. Ajike SO. Impacted foreign bodies in Dentistry. J West Afr Coll Surg 2015;5(3):x.

2. Datarkar AN, Dhawad M, Deshpande A. Unusual foreign body in mid face. J Maxillofac. Oral Surg 2015;14(1):96-9.

3. Sumanth KN, Boaz K, Shetty NY. Glass embedded in labial mucosa for 20 years. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19(2):160-1.

4. Jayasuriya NS, Karunathilaka PR, Wijekoon P. An unusual foreign object mimicking an odontoma in a patient with cleft alveolus: a case report. J. Med. Case Rep 20017;11(1):1-3.

5. Balaji SM. Buried broken extraction instrument fragment. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2013;3(1):93-94.

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.