Article
Editorial Article

Dr. Suchetha A

Editor-in-chief

Year: 2022, Volume: 14, Issue: 3, Page no. 1, DOI: 10.26715/rjds.14_3_1
Views: 603, Downloads: 18
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

None

<p>None</p>
Keywords
None
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

Every article needs to be peer reviewed. Peer reviewing is an art and finding reviewers is a herculean, timeconsuming and most challenging tasks as a journal editor. The rapid growth in article submissions means, editors now often have to find ten or more qualified potential reviewers to secure just a couple of reviews. There is a need to find reviewers with the right expertise to assess a submitted article. Peer review is the foundation for safeguarding the quality and integrity of scientific and scholarly research.

The main challenges for a reviewer in peer reviewing are:

- Knowing very well the field to which a certain manuscript belongs.

- Having experience in reviewing manuscripts.

- Having abilities to make reviewer’s remarks clear.

- Having enough time to evaluate the manuscript in depth.

- Obeying the editorial deadline for doing a review.

- Having a strong interest in scholarly journals.

- Being fluent in English.

As Eraldo Banovac said “Re-evaluate your abilities each time when you have been offered to review an article and say no thanks if the topic doesn’t belong to the field of your expertise.” Researchers in their careers start to build their experience in reviewing articles. They also need to be willing to write the review to a deadline, particularly in niche to research fields.

“The expert in anything was once a Beginner."

Supporting Files
No Pictures
References

None

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.