RGUHS Nat. J. Pub. Heal. Sci Vol No: 11 Issue No: 1 pISSN: 2249-2194
Dear Authors,
We invite you to watch this comprehensive video guide on the process of submitting your article online. This video will provide you with step-by-step instructions to ensure a smooth and successful submission.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.
Surekha S Medikeri1 , G R Vastrad2
1: Professor & Head, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Govt. Ayurveda Medical College, Bengaluru.
2: Former Principal, Taranath Govt Ayurvedic Medical College, Bellary.
Address for correspondence:
Surekha S Medikeri
Email: dsurekhamedikeri@gmail.com
Abstract
Shweta pradara is a very common lakshana (symptom) in females during reproductive period of life. Shweta pradara is not considered as a disease in brihatrayees , but as a symptom in kaphaja yoni vyapad.
Shweta srava from genital organs along with yoni kandu, kati shoola (lower back ache), yoni daha (burning sensation in vagina) are the clinical symptoms of shweta pradara. Detailed description of this disease is found in later books like laghutrayi, i.e. after the medieval period. Indians were the first to use metals for their therapeutic values. Vanga, known as pootiloha (which melts easily) is one among loha and was in use during samhita period as an external medicine (krimighna).
Vanga bhasma is one of the medicines described to have the action of “Shweta asrugdhara nasha”, by Rasataranginikara. Considering this reference, an observational study has been conducted to study the efficacy of vanga bhasma on Shwetapradara.
30 patients were selected randomly by conducting camp at OPD at TGAMC Bellary, and treated with 250mg vanga bhasma in equally divided doses with madhu as anupana for 15 days. The patients were followed up on 30th, 45th and 60th days. Reduction in clinical parameters in non-specific group patients was statistically significant whereas in specific groups was statistically non-significant. The action of vanga bhasma in both nonspecific and specific groups in Shwetha pradara is effective in variation with duration of treatment
Keywords
Downloads
-
1FullTextPDF
Article
INTRODUCTION
Metals have always been a matter of curiosity to humans. Indians were the first to use metals for their therapeutic values. Vanga, known as pootiloha1 (which melts easily) is one among the loha which was in use during samhita period as an external medicine (krimighna). In the later period, Sidda Nagarjuna and Rasacharyas used the metals for Parada Banda (loha vada) and Vyadhinirharana (Dehavada).Vanga is one such metal used for shukrakshaya, Shweta asrigdhara nasha2 . The properties of Vanga bhasma are tiktarasa, laghu, teekshna, sheeta guna and shleshmahara, and it is indicated in uro-genital system as stambaka. Shwetapradara is not mentioned as an independent disease in great trios,but can be seen as a symptom in many yonirogas, especially kaphaja yoni rogas3 .
‘Yonigata pichchila sheeta panduvarnayukta srava’ along with kandu and alpavedana are the classical symptoms of shweta pradara as per Acharya Charaka4 . But chakrapani in his commentary has used the term shwetapradara for paandura ashrugdhara, here pandura asrugdhara refers to shwetapradara. Later Sharangadhara, Bhavaprakasha,Yogaratnakara have used the word shweta pradara for white vaginal discharge. Leucorrhea is strictly defined as an excessive normal vaginal discharge6 . The excessive secretion is due to either Physiologic excess, Cervical causes or Vaginal causes which include high estrogen levels during puberty or during menstrual cycle , pregnancy; non infective cervical lesion; uterine prolapse, chronic pelvic inflammation, pill use and vaginal adenosis.
Rasataranginikara is the only Acharya who quotes vanga as shweta asrigdara nashaka7 . By observing properties of vangabhasma and its indications in the urogenital system as stambaka, an observational study has been conducted to confirm the efficacy of vanga bhasma in shweta pradara.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
• Preparation of vanga bhasma as per classical method
• To evaluate efficacy of vanga bhasma on shwetapradara.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1) Pharmaceutical study: Raw vanga purchased from the local market, Bellary, identified, according to classical reference. Samanya shodhana8 , Visheshashodhana9 , jarana of shodhitavanga10 and marana11, was carried out. Seven puta was required to attain the bhasma siddha lakshanas.
2) Clinical study: 30 patients were selected from the special camp conducted for shwetapradara, through PG Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajyakalpana, GAMC and Hospital Bellary.
Method of collection of data:
• Patients were diagnosed on the basis of clinical findings. • General examination, per-vaginal, per speculum examinations were carried out
• For vaginal smear, discharge was taken with sterile cotton swab and collected in a sterilized bottle. This was tested for candidiasis and T.V (Trichomonas Vaginalis) by using normal saline and 10% potassium hydroxide solution respectively.
• The pH of vagina was noted by using exact pH paper. It was kept in vaginal canal for one minute and change in the color of pH paper was compared with standard colour pH chart (standard pH value of vaginal canal is 4-5.5)
All these investigations were carried out before and after the treatment.
Inclusive criteria:
• Patients aged between 20-50 years.
• signs and symptoms mentioned in Ayurvedic classics
Exclusive criteria:
• Patients with other systemic diseases like madhumeha, karkatarbuda, samsargajavyadhi etc. which interfere with the cause of diseases and treatments will be excluded.
Parameters:
a) Per Vaginal examinations
I) manual ii) speculum.
b) Vaginal pH test
c) Vaginal smear test
Treatment schedule:
Dosage: 250mg./day,in two equally divided doses.
Anupana: madhu
Duration:15 days
Follow up:
The patients were followed up on the 45th day and 60th day.
Parameters for the assessment of results:
I. Subjective parameters: These are the parameters that were observed before, and after first and second week of treatment
i. Shweta srava
ii. Yoni kandu
iii. Kati shoola
iv. Mootradaha
II. Objective parameters: Improvements in the signs i,e.
i. Quantity,consistency,colour,and smell of the discharge.
ii. Vaginal smear test
iii. pH of the vaginal canal
These parameters were carried out before and after the treatment. The parameters were graded based on the severity as 3,2,1,0.
Sweta srava
• 3 (severe), denotes excess secretion which wets the undergarments, requires a sanitary pad throughout the month.
• 2 (moderate), denotes discharge which wets the undergarments and lasts for 10-15 days in a month.
• 1 (mild), denotes occasional discharge of 5 days in a month.
• 0 denotes normal secretion.
Kandu
• 3 - Itching throughout the day.
• 2 - Increases particular time of the day/night.
• 1 - Occasional
• 0 - Nil
Low backache
• 3 - Severe continous pain, no relief even after rest.
• 2 - Pain particular
• 1 - Particular time concerned with menstrual cycle
• 0 - Nil
RESULTS
Table 1 : Range of vaginal pH test conducted in the study group
Patients having normal pH range was more in no.56.66%
Table 2 : Clinical assessment data
• Total no. of patients with shwetasrava before treatment 30 i.e. (100%)
• Total no. of patients with shwetasrava after treatment 13 i.e. (43.3%)
• Treatment effect in terms of reduction - 56.7%
• Reduction in quantity of srava highly statistically significant at 0.1%
• Level of significance P<0.001;t=9.8.
Table 3 - Efficacy of vangabhasma on kandoo
• Total no.of patients with kandoo before treatment 30 i.e. (100%)
• Total no.of patients with kandoo after treatment 17 i.e. (56.66%)
• Treatment effect in terms of reduction - 44%
• Reduction in kandoo due to treatment is statistically highly significant at 0.1%
• Level of significance P<0.001; t=95.
Table 4: Efficacy of vangabhasma on katishoola
• Total patients with katishoola before treatment 26 i.e.(87%%)
• Total patients with katishoola after treatment 14 i.e.(47%)
• Treatment effect in terms of reduction-40%
• Reduction in katishoola due to treatment is statistically highly significant at 0.1%
• Level of significance P<0.001;t=9.52.
Table 5: Efficacy of vangabhasma on mootradaha
• Total patients with Mootradaha before treatment 28
• Total patients with Mootradaha after treatment 10 i.e. (33.3%)
• Treatment effect in terms of reduction- 46%
• Reduction in Mootradaha due to treatment is statistically highly significant at level of 0.1
• Level of significance P<0.001;t=9.4.
Table 7: Statistical assessment data on clinical parameters before and after treatment
The assessment data on clinical parameters before and after treatment was found to be statistically significant at rate P<0.001.
DISCUSSION
In this study 30 patients with shweta pradara lakshana were selected and clinically evaluated. On observation it is found that shweta pradara is more common during active reproductive phase of women in multiparous, in local contraceptive uses, in anaemic patients and in unhygienic conditions like home made sanitary pad users.
After the vaginal smear test, two types of patients were found- 17(56.67%) patients with non nonspecific groups and 13 patients (43.33) were with specific groups. Among specific group 6 (20%) patients were having candida infection and 7 (23.33%) were having T.V infections.
Both types of patients were treated with vanga bhasma 125mg with madhu as anupana, two times a day for 15 days. There was a significant response in a non-specific group of patients, but there was no response in specific types of patients during the first course of treatment. In such patients, treatment was carried out for second and third courses also.
The clinical assessment observation reveals that there was significant reduction in srava along with associated complaints like kandoo, katishoola and mootradaha which was statistically significant at a rate of p<0.001. T.V. infected patients remained in the mild form even after the third course of treatment.
CONCLUSION
Reduction in clinical parameters in nonspecific group patients is statistically highly significant whereas in specific groups is statistically not significant. The action of vangabhasma in both nonspecific and specific group leucorrhoea is effective in variation with duration of treatment.
Supporting File
References
1. Vagbhata, Kulkarni DA., Rasaratna Samuchchaya, Chapter 5, Verse 13, New Delhi; Meherchand Lachmandas Publication. Reprinted 2017, p.93
2. Sadananda Sharma , Rasa Tarangini, Chapter 18 , Verse 39-42, New Delhi; Motilal Banarasi Das Publication. 11th Edition , 1971 . p.443.
3. Agnivesha, Charaka, Drudhabala, Chakrapanidatta. Chikitsa sthana Chapter 30 Verse 22. In: Acharya YT (Edi.). Charaka Samhita with Ayurveda Deepika Commentary. Reprint Edition, 2014: Varanasi: Chaukhamba Publications. p. 635.
4. Agnivesha, Charaka, Drudhabala, Chakrapanidatta. Chikitsa sthana Chapter 30 Verse 13. In: Acharya YT(Edi.). Charaka Samhita with Ayurveda Deepika Commentary. Reprint Edition, 2014: Varanasi: Chaukhamba Publications. p. 635.
5. Agnivesha, Charaka, Drudhabala, Chakrapanidatta. Chikitsa sthana Chapter 30, Verse 116. In: Acharya YT(Edi.). Charaka Samhita with Ayurveda Deepika Commentary. Reprint Edition, 2014: Varanasi: Chaukhamba Publications. p. 639.
6. DC Dutta . Chapter 33. In: Hiralal Konkar(Edi.). DC Dutta’s textbook of gynecology. Reprinted 6th Edition. 2013. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. p.552.
7. Sadananda Sharma , Rasa Tarangini, Chapter 18 , Verse 39-42, New Delhi; Motilal Banarasi Das Publication. 11th Edition, 1971. p.443.
8. Vagbhata, Kulkarni DA., Rasaratna Samuchchaya, Chapter 5, Verse 13, New Delhi; Meherchand Lachmandas Publication. Reprinted 2017, p.93.
9. Vagbhata, Kulkarni DA., Rasaratna Samuchchaya, Chapter 5, Verse 156, New Delhi; Meherchand Lachmandas Publication. Reprinted 2017, p.124.
10. Madhava, Gularaja Sharma Mishra , Ayurveda Prakasha, Chapter 3, Verse 155- 159 , Chowkamba Vidya Bhavan , Varanasi. 2nd edition, 1962 . p.375.
11. Madhava , Gularaja Sharma Mishra , Ayurveda Prakasha, Chapter 3, Verse 170, Chowkamba Vidya Bhavan, Varanasi. 2nd edition, 1962 . p.378.