Article
Cover
RJAHS Journal Cover Page

Vol No: 4  Issue No: 2 eISSN:  

Article Submission Guidelines

Dear Authors,
We invite you to watch this comprehensive video guide on the process of submitting your article online. This video will provide you with step-by-step instructions to ensure a smooth and successful submission.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Original Article
Praveen Kumar John1, Pramod Kumar Venkappa*,2, Chandana Ramachandraiah3, Prajwal Adgur Ravikumar4,

1Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, AJ Institute of Medical Science and Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

2Mr. Pramod Kumar Venkappa, Department of Medical Imaging Technology, AJ Institute of Allied Health Science, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

3Department of Medical Imaging Technology, AJ Institute of Allied Health Science, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

4Department of Medical Imaging Technology, AJ Institute of Allied Health Science, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

*Corresponding Author:

Mr. Pramod Kumar Venkappa, Department of Medical Imaging Technology, AJ Institute of Allied Health Science, Mangalore, Karnataka, India., Email: pramodkumarsovenkappa@gmail.com
Received Date: 2023-08-09,
Accepted Date: 2023-10-31,
Published Date: 2023-12-31
Year: 2023, Volume: 3, Issue: 3, Page no. 11-15, DOI: 10.26463/rjahs.3_3_4
Views: 544, Downloads: 27
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

Background and aims: Skull morphology plays a key role in determining gender in medico-legal cases. Computed Tomography (CT) measurements of foramen magnum are useful in estimating gender. In this study, sagittal diameter, transverse diameter and area of foramen magnum were correlated. Also, different variations in the shape of foramen magnum were evaluated using computed tomography.

Methods: This study was conducted using CT Brain Scan images of individuals belonging to both the genders in the age group of 18 to 85 years. Morphometry of foramen magnum, sagittal diameter, transverse diameter, area of foramen magnum measurements and different shapes of foramen magnum were estimated on CT images using a 3D program on the CT workstation and were correlated against gender.

Result: In this study, sagittal diameter of foramen magnum was 33.5 ± 2.9 mm among males and 31.4 ± 3.2 mm among females. Transverse diameter was found to be 29.1 ± 3.3 mm in males and 26.7±3.7 mm in females. Area of foramen magnum was measured to be 642 ± 94.2 mm in males and 559.9 ± 115.5 mm in females. All the variables showed significant higher values in males than in females.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study conducted using CT scan images, the foramen magnum's diameter and area demonstrated a high degree of precision in gender identification. The results of this study could be used to identify human remains if other identifying techniques were unsuccessful.

<p><strong>Background and aims:</strong> Skull morphology plays a key role in determining gender in medico-legal cases. Computed Tomography (CT) measurements of foramen magnum are useful in estimating gender. In this study, sagittal diameter, transverse diameter and area of foramen magnum were correlated. Also, different variations in the shape of foramen magnum were evaluated using computed tomography.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> This study was conducted using CT Brain Scan images of individuals belonging to both the genders in the age group of 18 to 85 years. Morphometry of foramen magnum, sagittal diameter, transverse diameter, area of foramen magnum measurements and different shapes of foramen magnum were estimated on CT images using a 3D program on the CT workstation and were correlated against gender.</p> <p><strong>Result:</strong> In this study, sagittal diameter of foramen magnum was 33.5 &plusmn; 2.9 mm among males and 31.4 &plusmn; 3.2 mm among females. Transverse diameter was found to be 29.1 &plusmn; 3.3 mm in males and 26.7&plusmn;3.7 mm in females. Area of foramen magnum was measured to be 642 &plusmn; 94.2 mm in males and 559.9 &plusmn; 115.5 mm in females. All the variables showed significant higher values in males than in females.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Based on the findings of this study conducted using CT scan images, the foramen magnum's diameter and area demonstrated a high degree of precision in gender identification. The results of this study could be used to identify human remains if other identifying techniques were unsuccessful.</p>
Keywords
Computed Tomography, Sagittal diameter of foramen magnum, Transvers diameter of foramen magnum, Area of foramen magnum, Shapes of foramen magnum, Forensic
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article
Introduction

The study of sizes of foramen magnum (FM) is highly interesting due to the complexity of the cranial base from a descriptive and topographic points of view, due to the important relation of FM with its contents.1 Several scientific fields, involving forensic and physical anthropology, comparative anatomy, biology, surgery of the foramen structures, and the craniovertebral junction, have an affinity for the foramen magnum. Foramen magnum is the largest foramen in the skull.

The most noticeable feature in the floor of this aspect of the cranial base is a large central opening with an oval shape that is located in the deepest part of the posterior cranial fossa. It is found within the anteromedian aspect of the occipital bone, specifically.2 Anteriorly, it is bounded by the basiocciput. Posteriorly, it is bounded by the supraocciput. The occipital condyles surround it laterally.3

The foramen magnum on the occipital bone has two mid-line cephalometric landmarks. The middle of the foramen magnum's posterior margin is known as the opisthion. On the anterior margin of the foramen magnum, the basion is situated in the centre. The foramen magnum is separated into an anterior smaller compartment and a posterior larger compartment by the alar ligament, which is connected on either side to the tubercle of the occipital condyle. It is a component of the occipital bone and is situated in the most inferior region of the cranial fossa.4

Physical anthropology is applied to the legal system in forensic anthropology to identify skeletonized remains and related legal structures. Identification of skeletonized human remains is crucial because it can reveal whether a crime was committed, who committed it, the victim's ancestry, probable age, sex, and stature of the individual, as well as the perpetrator. For skeletal identification, mainly sex determination, aging, and stature estimation, comparisons have been done in several criminal cases. Human male skulls exhibit significantly higher sagittal and transverse dimensions of foramen magnum than human female skulls, according to research.5

Computed Tomography (CT) has been used to study fossilized skulls and analyse bite marks. The foramen magnum and its various shapes can be evaluated using computed tomography scans, which also provide detailed information that cannot be obtained from conventional radiographs. As a result, foramen magnum CT measurements can be used to determine gender.6 In this study, sagittal diameter, transverse diameter and area of foramen magnum were correlated against gender. Also, different variations in the shape of foramen magnum were evaluated using computed tomography.

The main purpose of the study was to radiologically estimate the sagittal and transverse diameters and also the area of foramen magnum using CT in order to determine the gender of specific individuals to support the field of forensic anthropology.

Materials and Methods

Study design: Record-based observational study

Participants: Patients who underwent Computed Tomography (CT) scan of brain between February 2021 to June 2022 were included.

Sampling technique: Purposive sampling technique

Sample size: On basis of study conducted by Khalil Awadh Murshed et al. (2003),1 in order to expect the mean difference of 26 mm in sagittal diameter and 23 mm in transverse diameter among males and females, assuming 95% confidence interval and 90% power with a pool standard deviation of 5, the sample size estimated for study was 156. Further assuming 10% known response rate, the final sample size estimated for study was 78 each. Hence, a total of 156 individuals were included in the study.

Inclusion criteria

Patients undergoing CT head in the age range of 18-85 years.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with previous history of surgery, trauma, or pathological lesions near the foramen magnum were not included in the study.

Study method

This retrospective study was designed based on CT head scan data from past three years (Record based study). Approval was acquired from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Data for the study were collected from the PACS (Picture Archiving and Communications System) of the hospital. Informed consent was taken from the patients. Plain head CT scan was performed using the multi-detector CT (Siemens somatom go top definition 128 slice) scans of brain plain protocol. Only the principal investigator had access to the confidential information that was collected during this research project. From the collection of old pictures using a 1 mm slice thickness, multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) images were obtained. After gathering each patient's raw data, the 2D CT scan axial images were converted using a post-processing (volume rendering) technique into 3D images. In syngo.via workstation, different foramen magnum measurements were measured on axial plane and from 3D volume rendering technique (VRT) images using the distance measurement tool. The method described by Abtehag A Taib et al.7 in their study to obtain foramen magnum's morphometry was applied to measure the sagittal diameter, transverse diameter, foramen magnum area, and various foramen magnum shapes. The largest anteroposterior dimension of the FM was measured as the FM sagittal diameter (FMSD). After using a 3D volume rendering analysis which was available in the syngo.via CT workstation to trace the bony margin of the FM on the CT image, the area (FMA) was automatically determined.

Data analysis

Z test was used to test significant difference in outcomes measured among males and females. Software from the Social Package of Statistical Science (SPSS, version 21) was used to analyze the data. By computing the mean and standard deviation of each foramen magnum measurement, statistical analysis was performed.

Results

The Table 1 depicts that the mean sagittal diameter was higher among males (33.5 ± 2.9 mm) as compared to females (31.4 ± 3.2 mm). Hence on using unpaired t test, high statistical significant difference was observed in the sagittal diameter among males and females (P <0.001).

It may be observed from the Table 1 that the mean transverse diameter was higher among males (29.1 ± 3.3 mm) as compared to females (26.7 ± 3.7 mm). Hence using unpaired t test, high statistical significant difference was observed in the transverse diameter among males and females (P <0.001)

Table 1 shows that the mean area of the part was more among males (642 ± 94.2) as compared to females (559.9 ± 115.5). Using Unpaired t test, statistically very high significant difference was observed in the mean area of the part among males and females (P <0.001).

Oval shape of foramen magnum was found to be most common among males. Round shape of foramen magnum was found to be equally distributed among males. Irregular shape of foramen magnum was found to be most common among females. Pentagon shape of foramen magnum was found to be most common among males. Hexagonal shape of foramen magnum was found to be most common among males. Tetragonal shape of foramen magnum was found to be most common among females (Figure 1).

Discussion

One hundred fifty six computed tomography (CT) heads (78 men and 78 women) were used in this study. The average age of study participants was 52.48 ± 19.04 years. The descriptive statistics of three variables, which include the mean and standard deviation for both genders were reported in the current study. Foramen magnum in male participants had larger overall mean values than females, indicating a significant difference between the two groups, according to the morphometric analysis of foramen magnum measurements. Sagittal diameter, transverse diameter, and foramen magnum area morphology were determined, and gender differences in these morphologies were established. Additionally, measurements were taken of various foramen magnum shapes. The results of this study showed a strong relationship between gender and foramen magnum. Males had significantly higher morpho metric measurements than females, such as sagittal diameter, transverse diameter, and area. Males had longer mean and SD values for the sagittal diameter (m = 33.5 ± 2.91), transverse diameter (M = 29.1 ± 3.3), and area (M = 642.2± 94.2, F = 559 ± 115.5) than females.

Foramen magnum morphometric measurements revealed a highly significant statistical difference between the male and female groups (P=0.001). An important task in forensic medicine is identifying the sex of incomplete or damaged skeletons. Such gender identification issues can be resolved with the aid of anthropometric measurements. Since it is a regular structure and is less likely to undergo significant morphological changes, the foramen magnum was chosen. The present study depicts sagittal value of 33.5 ± 2.91 mm in males and 31.4 ± 3.23 mm in females with the P value ˂0.001 which is lower than the study reported by Uthman et al., 7 (34.9±2.00 in males, 32.9±2.00 in females with the P value ˂0.001). It is also lower than the study reported by Radhakrishna SK8 (34.09 ± 2.36 mm in males and 31.72 ± 2.14 mm in females with the P value ˂0.005) and the study reported by Aghakhani, K et al.9 (37.7 ± 1.0 in males and 34.3 ± 1.4 in females with P value˂ 0.001).

The following findings were obtained when the results of this study's morphometric analysis were compared to those of other studies. The transverse diameter of foramen magnum in the present study was estimated as 29.1 ± 3.3 mm in males and 26.7 ± 3.7 mm in females with the P value ˂0.001 which is lesser than the study reported by Uthman et al.7 (29.5 ± 2.5 in males and 27.3 ± 2.2 in females) which is higher than the study reported by Radhakrishna SK8 (28.63 ± 1.89 in males and 26.59 ± 1.64 in females with P value ˂0.005), which is lesser than the study reported by Aghakhani K et al.9 (31.68 ± 1.2 in males and 28.3 ± 1.43 in females with P value ˂0.001).

The results of this study's morphometric analysis when compared to those of other studies were as follows:for the area of foramen magnum, the present study estimated 642.2 ± 94.2 in males and 559.5 ± 115.5 in females with the P value ˂ 0.001 which is lesser than the study reported by Aghakhani K et al.9 (946 ± 61.9 in males and 773.9 ± 70.3 in females, with P value lesser than 0.001) and also, was lesser than that reported by Uthman et al. 7 (765.2 ± 98 in males and 670.2 ± 93.7 in females with the P value ˂ 0.001). The findings showed that the foramen magnum exhibits sexual dimorphism. Metric analysis of the foramen magnum in incomplete skeletons may offer a statistically significant hint as to the sex of the unidentified head. The findings of this study suggest that the foramen magnum is significant in determining gender. Due to genetic, environmental, and dietary factors, the outcomes may vary geographically and can also depend on skeletal structure. The above study can be of aid for practical utilization to determine the gender in the field of forensic radiology by clinically evaluating and measuring the dimensions of foramen magnum using computed tomography. 

Conclusion

The present study concluded that the foramen magnum estimations can be useful with a high precision of accuracy in determining gender. Based on the results of this study conducted using CT scan images, the diameters of the foramen magnum and its area showed a high precision in sex determination.

Limitations

The above study has been conducted over a limited period of time in a single population; hence cannot be generalized to other populations or ethnicities.

Conflict of Interest

Nil

Supporting File
References
  1. Murshed KA, Çiçekcibaşi AE, Tuncer I. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci 2003;33(5):301-306. 
  2. Drake RL, Vogl W, Mitchell AWM, Gray H. Gray's anatomy for students. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2015.
  3. Sanchez P, Graham JM. Congenital anomalies of the skull. In: Swaiman's Pediatric Neurology (6th Ed). Elsevier; 2017. p. 233-241. 
  4. Dutta AK. Essentials of human anatomy head & neck. Kolkata: Current Books International; 2013. p. 56-57. 
  5. Zdilla MJ, Russell ML, Bliss KN, Mangus KR, Koons AW. The size and shape of the foramen magnum in man. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2017;8(3):205-221.
  6. Seeram E. CT physical principles, clinical applications and quality control. 4th edition. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2015. 
  7. Taib AA, Greiw ASH, Leias EA, Ambarak OO, Abdalla MA. Morphometric evaluation of foramen magnum by using computerized tomographic images. Int J Clin Ski 2019;13(2):273-277. 
  8. Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Timimi JF. Evaluation of foramen magnum in gender determination using helical CT scanning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41(3):197-202. 
  9. Radhakrishna SK, Shivarama CH, Ramakrishna A, Bhagya B. (2012) Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum for sex determination in south Indian population. NITTE Univ J Health Sci 2012;2(1):20-22. 
  10. Aghakhani K, Kazemzadeh N, Ghafurian F, Soltani B, Soltani S. Gender determination using diagnostic values of foramen magnum. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med 2016;6:29-35.
  11. Galdames IC, Russo PR, Matamala DA, Smith RL. Sexual dimorphism in the foramen magnum dimensions. Int J Morphol 2009;27:21-37. 
  12. Holland TD. Race determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base. J Forensic Sci 1986;31(2):719-725. 
  13. Hecht TJ, Horton WA, Reid CS, Pyeritz RE, Chakraborty R. Growth of the foramen magnum in achondroplasia. Am J Med Genet 1989;32:528-35. 
  14. Reich JB, Sierra J, Camp W, Zanzonico P, Deck MD, Plum F. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements and clinical changes accompanying trans tentorial and foramen magnum brain herniation. Ann Neurol 1993;33:159-70. 
HealthMinds Logo
RGUHS Logo

© 2024 HealthMinds Consulting Pvt. Ltd. This copyright specifically applies to the website design, unless otherwise stated.

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.