Article
Cover
RNJPH Journal Cover Page

RGUHS Nat. J. Pub. Heal. Sci Vol No: 9  Issue No: 3 eISSN: 2584-0460

Article Submission Guidelines

Dear Authors,
We invite you to watch this comprehensive video guide on the process of submitting your article online. This video will provide you with step-by-step instructions to ensure a smooth and successful submission.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Original Article

Ramya N1 , Saraswathi S2 , Ranganath T S3

1- MBBS, Postgraduate Student,

2- MD, Assistant Professor,

3- MD, Professor and Head, Department of Community Medicine, Bangalore Medical College & Research Institute, Bengaluru - 560002

Corresponding Author :

Ramya N,MBBS

Post graduate Student, Department of Community Medicine,

Bangalore Medical College & Research Institute,

Fort, K.R. Road, Bengaluru - 560002

Email: nagarajanramya55@gmail.com

Year: 2016, Volume: 1, Issue: 4, Page no. 153-157,
Views: 957, Downloads: 6
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antenatal depression, also known as prenatal depression, is a form of clinical depression that can affect a woman during pregnancy. In many women, antenatal depression continues to progress into postnatal depression affecting both the mother and the child. Maternal distress during pregnancy is associated with increased infant cortisol levels and has an impact on the developing foetal brain leading to cognitive, emotional and behavioural difficulties in childhood. Hence, an accurate assessment of depression during pregnancy is essential to safeguard the well- being of the mother and child. This study aims to assess the prevalence of depression and factors influencing depression in pregnant women.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out between May 2016 to August 2016 in a large public tertiary care hospital in Bangalore. One hundred and fifty antenatal mothers were interviewed employing the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).

RESULTS: We found that14.6% of antenatal women had high levels of depression, 21.3% had moderate levels of depression and 64% had low levels of depression. Coming to the contributing factors, 42.1% of antenatal women who had not had antenatal visits previously, 18.75% of antenatal women who had delivered through C-section earlier, 38% of antenatal women whose mothers were no more and 18.75% of antenatal women who had ‘difficult’ relationships with their husbands, all had statistically significant‘high levels’ of depression.

CONCLUSION: The study emphasises that factors for depression among pregnant women include being irregular in attending ANC visits, relationship issues with the husband and other family members and having lost their mothers.

 

<p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Antenatal depression, also known as prenatal depression, is a form of clinical depression that can affect a woman during pregnancy. In many women, antenatal depression continues to progress into postnatal depression affecting both the mother and the child. Maternal distress during pregnancy is associated with increased infant cortisol levels and has an impact on the developing foetal brain leading to cognitive, emotional and behavioural difficulties in childhood. Hence, an accurate assessment of depression during pregnancy is essential to safeguard the well- being of the mother and child. This study aims to assess the prevalence of depression and factors influencing depression in pregnant women.</p> <p><strong>METHODS:</strong> A cross-sectional study was carried out between May 2016 to August 2016 in a large public tertiary care hospital in Bangalore. One hundred and fifty antenatal mothers were interviewed employing the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).</p> <p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> We found that14.6% of antenatal women had high levels of depression, 21.3% had moderate levels of depression and 64% had low levels of depression. Coming to the contributing factors, 42.1% of antenatal women who had not had antenatal visits previously, 18.75% of antenatal women who had delivered through C-section earlier, 38% of antenatal women whose mothers were no more and 18.75% of antenatal women who had &lsquo;difficult&rsquo; relationships with their husbands, all had statistically significant&lsquo;high levels&rsquo; of depression.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> The study emphasises that factors for depression among pregnant women include being irregular in attending ANC visits, relationship issues with the husband and other family members and having lost their mothers.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>
Keywords
Pregnancy, Depression, Antenatal mothers, Prenatal
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

Introduction

Pregnancy is a period of normal physiological phenomenon associated with hormonal changes in women and attempts to adapt these changes may increase the likelihood of psychological and emotional disturbances that may initiate antenatal depression (1). According to WHO, the depressive disorders will be the second leading cause of global disease burden, and rates of depression in women of reproductive age [2] are reported to be twice than in men . Antenatal depression is associated with adverse foetal outcomes including intrauterine growth retardation, low birth weight, preterm delivery and infant behavioural [3] problems . Apart from physiological effects on foetus, depression in pregnancy can affect a mother's functional status and cause cognitive distortions (4). Identification of and assessment of depression during pregnancy is very important for early intervention in order to prevent the adverse outcomes on both mother and baby. Hence this study is conducted to estimate the prevalence of depression & to determine the factors influencing depression among antenatal mothers.

Methods

Study Design: Cross – Sectional Study.

Study Area: Tertiary care centre, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute (BMCRI).

Study Duration: May To August 2016.

Study Population: Antenatal mothers who visited Tertiary care centre .

Sample Size: Based on previous study by Pajulo M (4) et al sample size was estimated to be 150.

Sampling Method: 150 Antenatal mothers were included in the study by non probability sampling technique.

Inclusion Criteria: Antenatal mothers who visited the tertiary care centre during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria: Participants who did not give consent for the study.

Data Collection: Data was collected by interview method by using semi-structured questionnaire, after obtaining verbal consent from the study participants by thoroughly explaining the details of the study.

Part A: Socio-demographic Profile. Socio economic status was assessed by using Kuppu swamyscale (5).

Part B: EDINBURGH POSTNATAL Depression Scale (EPDS) (6). Depression is assessed by scoring of 0 to 9 is considered as low, 10-12 is considered as moderate and> 13 is considered as high.

Data Analysis: Data was entered in excel and analysed using SPSS software. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test. 

Results

In our study, regarding socio-demographic details about 70.66% of antenatal mothers belongs to 15-25 years of age group. Majority of them are Hindus constituting about 70.66%. About 89.33% of antenatal mothers are literates and about 64% of antenatal mothers are unemployed which are illustrated in Table.1

Regarding obstetric details, about 54.66% of antenatal mothers are multigravida and 13.33% of antenatal mothers had bad obstetric history. About 12.66% of antenatal mothers does not had any antenatal visits previously. About 21.33% of antenatal mothers had caesarean as mode of delivery of previous child and about 12.66% of antenatal mothers had abnormal thyroid profile(Hypothyroid) which are illustrated in Table.2 

Regarding maternal factors and family support, about 12% of mother of antenatal mothers were dead, about 42.66% of antenatal mothers had unhealthy relationship with their husbands and about 47% of antenatal mothers had unhealthy relationship with other members of their family. About 28.66% of antenatal mothers had unplanned pregnancy which are illustrated in Fig.1, Fig.2, Fig.3, Fig.4 respectively.

EPDS scaling is commonly used for both antenatal and postnatal depression. By using this scaling about 14.6% of antenatal mothers had high levels of depression, 21.3% of antenatal mothers had moderate levels of depression and 64% of antenatal mothers had low levels of depression which are illustrated in Fig.5. Significance of association is found between each factor and depression which are illustrated in Table.3, Table.4, Table.5 and factors like antenatal visits, mode of delivery of previous child, mother's status of antenatal mother and relationship with husband are found to be statistically significant.

Discussion

In our sample,70.66% of antenatal mothers belonged to the 15-25 years age group. Majority of them were Hindus, constituting about 70.66%. Around 89% of antenatal mothers were literates and 64% of the antenatal mothers are unemployed. Around 13% of antenatal mothers had had a bad obstetric history, 12.66% of antenatal mothers did not attend any antenatal visits previously, 21.33% of antenatal mothers had caesarean mode of delivery for the previous child and about 12.66% of antenatal mothers had an abnormal thyroid profile (were hypothyroid). Among these antenatal women, twelve percent of their mothers were no more, around 42.66% of antenatal women had 'unhealthy' relationship with their husbands and about 47% of antenatal mothers had 'unhealthy' relationships with other members of their family. About 28.66% of antenatal mothers had unplanned pregnancy. As per EPDS scaling, about 14.6% of antenatal mothers had high levels of depression, 21.3% of antenatal mothers had moderate levels of depression and 64% of antenatal mothers had low levels of depression.

In a similar study conducted by Jacob V and Imran S et al among 100 antenatal mothers, about 38% of antenatal mothers belonged to 24-29 years age group. Majority belonged to Hindu religion and about 41% lived in a nuclear family. 20% of antenatal mothers who hhad a bad obstetric history had high levels of depression. According to EPDS scaling, 10% of antenatal mothers had high depression, 21% had moderate and 69% had low levels of depression. In another study conducted by EmreYanikkren, Semra AY et al among 651 antenatal mothers, around 87% of antenatal mothers were unemployed. 7.7% of antenatal mothers did not perceive social support from husband and other relatives of family. 9.2% of antenatal mothers belonging to nuclear family had high levels of depression. According to EPDS scaling about 10.9% had high depression, 22% had moderate and 68% had low levels of depression.

Conclusion

In our study, about 64% of antenatal mothers had low levels of depression, 21.3% had moderate and 14.6% had high levels of depression. It also noted that significant association is found between the factors like mother's status of antenatal mother, relationship with husband, ANC visits and mode of delivery of previous child and depression. Other important factors like bad obstetric history and unplanned pregnancy also contribute to high levels of depression.These findings suggests the need of training the doctors and nurses regarding the assessment and screening of antenatal mother about depression during each antenatal visits and to take, measures immediately and appropriately as required. This can help prevent andmanage antenatal depression as well as its future consequences on mother, child and entire family. 

 

Supporting File
References

1. Fadzil A, Balakrishnan K, Razali R, Sidi H, Malapan T. Risk factors for depression and anxiety among pregnant women. J Asia Pacific Psychiatry 2013, vol(5); 7-13.Available from:[http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.12036]

2. WHO Mental health aspect of women's reproductive health, a global review of literature. Geneva, World health organisation/ United Nations Population Fund; 2009.

3. Evans J, Heron J, Patel RR, Wiles N. Depressive symptoms during pregnancy and low birth weight at term. Br J Psychiatry 2007;191:84-5. Available from:[http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1192/bjp.bp. 105.0 16568]

4. Pajulo M, Savonlahti E, Sourander A, Helenius H, Piha J. Antenatal depression, substance dependency and social support. J Affect Disorder 2001;65:9-17.[http://dx .doi.org/10.1016/s0165- 0327(00)00265-2]

5. K u p p u s w a m y s c a l e u p d a t e [ I n t e r n e t ] . Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale update. 2016 [Cited 17 August 2016]. Available from: [http://scaleup date.weebly.com/]

6. Cox, J.L, Holden, Sagovsky R. Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:782.

HealthMinds Logo
RGUHS Logo

© 2024 HealthMinds Consulting Pvt. Ltd. This copyright specifically applies to the website design, unless otherwise stated.

We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.