Article
Original Article

Lavanya Subhashini1 , Radha MS2 , Baby GK3

  1.  Associate Professor, Sri Devaraj Urs College of Nursing, Tamaka, Kolar 
  2. Professor, Sri Devaraj Urs College of Nursing, Tamaka, Kolar 
  3. Asst Lecturer, Sri Devaraj Urs College of Nursing, Tamaka, Kolar

Author for correspondence

Lavanya Subhashini

Associate Professor, Sri Devaraj Urs College of Nursing,

Tamaka, Kolar-56101

Mobile Number-09008900768

Year: 2018, Volume: 8, Issue: 2, Page no. 28-32, DOI: 10.26715/rjns.8_2_5
Views: 2216, Downloads: 103
Licensing Information:
CC BY NC 4.0 ICON
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0.
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation Techniques have an important role in evaluating students’ learning outcomes and their mastery of a subject. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is one of the best evaluation techniques, which can accurately evaluate basic care giving skills of nursing students. This article explores the use of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in undergraduate nursing education.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of OSCE in appraisal of clinical skills in Pediatric Nursing among III yr B Sc Nursing students. To explore and describe the perception of students regarding OSCE as a method of clinical evaluation

METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional descriptive survey design was adopted for the study and 34 third year BSc Nursing students were selected by convenience sampling technique. The study was conducted at R L Jalapa Hospital and Research Centre, Parent Hospital of Sri Devaraj Urs College of Nursing, Kolar. OSCE evaluation questionnaire developed by Pierre et al (2004), was adopted in this study.

RESULTS: Majority of students agreed exams are well administered and covered wide area of knowledge. With regard to valuation of assessment of Quality of OSCE performance testing, majority of students agreed to a great extent that Instructions were clear and unambiguous Regarding Assessment of student perception of validity & reliability of OSCE, majority believed that OSCE scores provided true measure of essential clinical skills.

CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that, as an assessment tool, the objective of overall nursing students’ perception about OSCE was positive; The OSCE was found to be a useful and acceptable method for evaluating nursing students’ clinical competence in the area of Pediatric Nursing.

KEY WORDS: OSCE, clinical competencies, Nursing students

<p><strong>INTRODUCTION:</strong> Evaluation Techniques have an important role in evaluating students&rsquo; learning outcomes and their mastery of a subject. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is one of the best evaluation techniques, which can accurately evaluate basic care giving skills of nursing students. This article explores the use of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in undergraduate nursing education.</p> <p><strong>OBJECTIVES</strong>: To determine the effectiveness of OSCE in appraisal of clinical skills in Pediatric Nursing among III yr B Sc Nursing students. To explore and describe the perception of students regarding OSCE as a method of clinical evaluation</p> <p><strong>METHODOLOGY:</strong> A cross sectional descriptive survey design was adopted for the study and 34 third year BSc Nursing students were selected by convenience sampling technique. The study was conducted at R L Jalapa Hospital and Research Centre, Parent Hospital of Sri Devaraj Urs College of Nursing, Kolar. OSCE evaluation questionnaire developed by Pierre et al (2004), was adopted in this study.</p> <p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> Majority of students agreed exams are well administered and covered wide area of knowledge. With regard to valuation of assessment of Quality of OSCE performance testing, majority of students agreed to a great extent that Instructions were clear and unambiguous Regarding Assessment of student perception of validity &amp; reliability of OSCE, majority believed that OSCE scores provided true measure of essential clinical skills.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> The findings indicated that, as an assessment tool, the objective of overall nursing students&rsquo; perception about OSCE was positive; The OSCE was found to be a useful and acceptable method for evaluating nursing students&rsquo; clinical competence in the area of Pediatric Nursing.</p> <p><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong> OSCE, clinical competencies, Nursing students</p>
Keywords
OSCE, clinical competencies, Nursing students
Downloads
  • 1
    FullTextPDF
Article

INTRODUCTION

Evaluation Techniques have an important role in evaluating students’ learning outcomes and their mastery of a subject. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is one of the best evaluation techniques, which can accurately evaluate basic care giving skills of nursing students.

Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), introduced for the first time in 1975 by Dr. Ronald Harden.1 Harden and Glason believed that OSCE provides a chance to evaluate different skills in different situations in clinical areas. Several dental schools have incorporated the OSCE in their curricula since 1994 and it has been evaluated since then.2-4  

Now a days, OSCE is one of the best examination techniques, which can easily evaluate basic and professional skills of students and also determine goals of education in different fields, including recognition, sentimentalization, and psychicdynamic aspects, by showing students’ abilities in different stations, eliminating the effects of intermediate variables.5-6 Over the years, OSCE has been used with real patients to evaluate clinical skills of students before and after graduation.

OBJECTIVES

  • To determine the effectiveness of OSCE in appraisal of clinical skills in Pediatric Nursing among III yr B Sc Nursing students 
  • To explore and describe the perception of students regarding OSCE as a method of clinical evaluation

METHODOLOGY

A cross sectional descriptive survey design was adopted for the study to determine the effectiveness of OSCE in appraisal of clinical skills in Pediatric Nursing among III yr B Sc Nursing students and explore and describe the perception of students regarding OSCE as a method of clinical evaluation. A convenience sampling technique of 34 III yr BSc Nursing students were selected. The study was conducted at R L Jalappa Hospital and Research Centre, Parent Hospital of Sri Devaraj Urs College of Nursing, Kolar. OSCE evaluation questionnaire developed by Pierre et al (2004), was adopted in this study. The questionnaire consisted of 30 items. Six stations were made and clear instructions were given to students. Five minutes was allotted for each station. Each station was assessed with check list. After assessing their clinical performance, questionnaire was given to the students to assess their opinion regarding OSCE evaluation, quality of performance testing through OSCE and their perception of Validity and Reliability of OSCE. Data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics and presented as frequency and percentage.

RESULTS

I. Clinical Performance of Pediatric skills at different stations

As depicted in table 1 the students demonstrated higher level of competency in the area of Pediatric Nursing skills like health education, assessing Degree of Mal-Nutrition and Drug calculation (9.94%), nursing care plan (9.05%) and procedure demonstration (8.58%) compared to nursing diagnosis (7.94%), growth and development (6.26%) and history collection (2.67%).

II. OSCE EVALUATION

As depicted in table 2 with regard to evaluation of OSCE attributes, majority of students agreed exams are well administered (94.1) and covered wide area of knowledge (91.1). They also felt exam was fair (85.3) and well structured and sequenced (88.2). Nearly half of students also stated exam is very stressful (44.1) and also less stressful than other exams (55.8%). Nearly 70.5% of students stated OSCE highlighted areas of weaknesses and covered wide range of clinical skills.

With regard to valuation of assessment of Quality of OSCE performance testing, majority of students agreed to a great extent that Instructions were clear and unambiguous (91.1), Exam provided opportunities to learn (82.3), Sequence of stations logical and appropriate (85.3) and very few students agreed to a great extent that the time at each station was adequate (11.8) and fully aware of nature of exam (32.3). 26.4 of students reported not at all to time at each station was adequate.

Regarding Assessment of student perception of validity & reliability, majority believed that OSCE scores provided true measure of essential clinical skills (91.17), useful experience (88.23) and OSCE scores are standardized (79.4). Half of the students stated Personality and social relations will not affect OSCE scores.

DISCUSSION

The assessment of clinical competence is an important issue in nursing education and the utilization of objective structured clinical evaluation for that purpose was considered to be very important in this study. Evaluation of assessment of Quality of OSCE performance, majority of students reported that Instructions were clear (91.1) and well administered (94.1). A similar report by Small, L.F11 et al indicated that large number of the students, namely 65% felt that they had received sufficient information from their lecturers in preparation for their OSCE examinations. Few students also stated exam is very stressful (44.1). A silimilar finding was also reported by Small, L.F11 et al whereas other study by Hatamleh W12 et al reported 78 % perceived OSCE to be stressful. 

Overall nursing students’ perception about OSCE was positive. The findings are supported by the findings of other research studies by Saed AM13 et al, Amina MR14et al and Hatamleh W13 et al where the students preferred OSCE compared to other traditional method. As most of the studies reports similar finding the OSCE evaluation tool could be considered as per the students need. 

CONCLUSION

The OSCE is considered as one of the best means to provide standardized and objective evaluation of clinical skills of nursing students to help them to master different clinical skills. To assess its effectiveness and students opinion regarding the OSCE, this study was taken up. The findings reveled that it is one of the best method to assess the clinical competency of students in pediatric nursing. Overall nursing students’ perception about OSCE was positive and preferred OSCE as a method of evaluation, and all students recommended to adopt in all other specialties. One of the practical examinations can be assessed by OSCE method for undergraduate nursing curriculum to identify their performance of psychomotor skills, including application of knowledge and understanding.

 

Supporting Files
No Pictures
References
  1.  Rushforth HE. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): Review of literature and implications for nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2007;27:481–90.
  2. 2. Kim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, Chiu M, Clinch J. A pilot study using high-fidelity simulation to formally evaluate performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients: The university of Ottawa critical care medicine, high-fidelity simulation, and crisis resource management I study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2167–74.
  3. 3. Barman A. Critiques on the objective structured clinical examination. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005;34:478–82.
  4. 4. Zartman RR, McWhorter AG, Seale NS, Boone WJ. Using OSCE-based evaluation: Curricular impact over time. J Dent Educ. 2002;66:1323–30.
  5. 5. Mossey PA, Newton JP, Stirrups DR. Scope of the OSCE in the assessment of clinical skills in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2001;190:323–6
  6. 6. Lie D, May W, Richter-Lagha R, Forest C, Banzali Y, Lohenry K. Adapting the McMasterOttawa scale and developing behavioral anchors for assessing performance in an interprofessional team observed structured clinical encounter.
  7.  Ross M., Carroll G., Knight J., Chamberlain M., Et Al.: Using The OSCE To Measure Clinical Skills Performance In Nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 13 (1): 45-56, 1988.
  8.  Harden R., Stevenson M., Downie W. And WilSon G.: Assessment Of Clinical Competence Using Objective Structured Examination. British Medical Journal, 1 (5955): 447-451, 1975.
  9.  Ahmad C., Ahmad N. And Baker R.: Assessing Nursing Clinical Skills Performance Using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) For Open Distance Learning Students In Open University Malaysia. International Conference on Information; Kuala Lumpur, 12- 13 August, 2009. 
  10. Austin Z., O’byrne C., Pugsley J. And Munoz L.: Development and Validation Processes For An Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) For Entry-To-Practice Certification In Pharmacy: The Canadian Experience. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67 (3): 1-8, 2003. 
  11. Small, L.F., Pretorius, L., Walters, A., Ackerman, M. & Tshifugula, P., 2013, ‘Students’ perceptions regarding the objective, structured, clinical evaluation as an assessment approach’, Health SA Gesondheid18(1), Art. #629, 8 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v18i1.629. 
  12. Hatamleh W, Sabeeb Z. Nursing student’s perceptions of an objectives structured clinical examination. International Journal of Health Care Sciences. 2015; 2(2): 52-56. 
  13. Amina MR, Nemer EL, Kandeel N. Using OSCE as an Assessment Tool for Clinical Skills: Nursing Students’ Feedback. Med. J. Cairo Univ., Vol. 77, No. 4, June: 457-464, 2009 
  14. Saed A M and Abbas NI. Feedback of undergraduate nursing students aboutobjective structured practical examination Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2017, Vol. 7, No. 3.
We use and utilize cookies and other similar technologies necessary to understand, optimize, and improve visitor's experience in our site. By continuing to use our site you agree to our Cookies, Privacy and Terms of Use Policies.